And what if I make a movie called "The Shawshank Recidivist" where Red goes on a killing spree after being paroled, would that justify cancelling all parole? No, because it is just a movie, not reality.
So a Hollywood MOVIE justifies letting killers out of jail?
This man’s brain just ain’t wired right.
Can we use ANY movie to justify anything now?
In related news, Fetterman believes you can bullseye womp rats from a T-38 because he saw Star Wars.
Seems to me before Morgan Freeman was freed from prison, his response back to the parole board was ‘bullsh*t’.
And he was freed.
But, that should be our response also.
I don’t follow this ogre outside of FR postings. Has this guy said ANYTHING about crime victims?
Andy Dufresne was imprisoned because he was convicted through the misconduct of the prosecution. If Fetterman’s real point was that prosecutors need to be reined in, I might agree with some of that argument.
But Andy wasn’t a murderer, so the idea that the story justifies releasing convicted murders in general doesn’t follow from the story at all.
The dude is bat crap crazy.
We are living “Idiocracy”! The idiots are running the world!
Well there you go, just not in the way he intended.
Don't forget to pick up a quality souvenir at the Prison Showroom, the location that was the inspiration for Shawshank prison.
358 Main St, Thomaston, ME 04861
(Mashiach in prison)
Besides, what's in the name of the one who brought up the [Shawshank] Redemption?
Metaphorically, a fetter may be anything that restricts or restrains in any way, hence the word "unfettered".
Why the leg cuffs?
"A fast-walking man is hard to beat."
If people laugh at the movie reference for its being fiction, how much more so stop-motion animation?
🤫
So, what about ‘Designated Survivor’? /s