Posted on 09/27/2022 4:54:01 AM PDT by Oldeconomybuyer
Consensus through censorship.
Just ask bill nigh.
Sorry, those folks were NOT scientists.
They are folks who have no income source sans corrupt government funding.
Those of us practicing real science have to have models that actually work that help produce systems that actually function.
Thus far, I’ve seen a whole lot of crap out there...which would result in a strong D+ or C- from a competent professor.
Who are “those folks” ? It seems that politics ($) is driving which team some people are on…
“Climate scientists” are not scientists, they are political activists masquerading as “scientists.”
This appears to be the dreaded paper:
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/357805134_A_critical_assessment_of_extreme_events_trends_in_times_of_global_warming
I posted this in an earlier thread about this article:
Report finds ‘no evidence’ of a climate emergency“
Article mentioned in the report (a good read):
“ A critical assessment of extreme events trends in times of global warming”
https://link.springer.com/article/10.1140/epjp/s13360-021-02243-9
This! Precisely!
From another time:
On June 22, 1633, the Church handed down the following order: “We pronounce, judge, and declare, that you, the said Galileo… have rendered yourself vehemently suspected by this Holy Office of heresy, that is, of having believed and held the doctrine (which is false and contrary to the Holy and Divine Scriptures) that the sun is the center of the world, and that it does not move from east to west, and that the earth does move, and is not the center of the world.”
“It is not published in a climate journal…”
This is true. It was published in a physics journal, The European Physical Journal - Plus (EPJ Plus).
https://www.springer.com/journal/13360
Latest articles include:
Release criteria and exposure of caregivers and public after discharge of patients undergoing 131I-MIBG, 131I-NaI and 177Lu-DOTATATE therapies
Wormhole in f(Q) gravity
Nonlinear dynamics of a liquid film flow over a solid substrate in the presence of external shear stress and electric field
Refractive index and temperature sensor based on dual-D-shapes photonic crystal fiber surface plasmon resonance
Investigation of the fundamental working mechanism for high-performance Sb2(S1−xSex)3 solar cells
“All four of the experts consulted by AFP suggested that the study should never have been published in the first place, and two of them called for it to be withdrawn.”
ALL “four (4) of the experts ...” “... and two of them called for it to be withdrawn.”
I’m sooooo impressed. NOT!
Physics includes fluid dynamics of which weather AND climate are a part.
Compiling data on the frequencies of these types of storms seems like it should be pretty straight forward along with plotting data points in frequency over time.
Determining cause is impossible (butterfly effect?) except for the best scientific minds who are skilled at manipulating data and variables until it “proves” their theory and keeps the big $$$ rolling in.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.