Let the circus begin.
Trump had better have his ducks in a row and not running his mouth...
based on the fib inventory?
or what was actually taken...
“...has given the former president until next Friday to back up his allegation that FBI planted evidence in the search on Aug. 8.”
Well, turn over what was taken so he can see.
However, it looks like Trump’s advisers have convinced him to go along with another loser. Makes one wonder, when will Trump fire all his advisers?
In related news, Trump’s advisers are recommending that he enlist adam schiff as his running mate for 2024. It is thought that schiff’s positive relationship with the MSM might defrost the MSMs attitude toward Trump.
I thought it was the seriousness of the allegation that mattered?
The Trump team PICKED this a-hole... a corrupt judge who already fk’d him over on the FISA warrants.
Why would they chose this person?
That’s why you and your lawyers need to be present during the raid.
He doesn’t have to back it up you tool. The FBI has to prove they DIDN’T.
They excluded his attorney, they demanded cameras be shut off, they refuse to let his see what they took. This special master is a joke. Blow him off.
He is trying to trap Trump into saying what he declassified before the FBI will reveal what they took. If Trump does that, they can easily slip in one more thing and trap him.
Better to let them make their case, have Trump explain it was declassified. They cannot prove differently and the Supreme court will back this up. Then he wins 2024 in a landslide.
If they lock him up somewhere, America needs to storm the Bastille.
The fact that the FBI wouldn’t let anyone at Mar-a-Lago observe their searches, and that they ordered them to turn off their cameras (which they didn’t) should be enough to raise questions about the actions that were taken by the agents who conducted the search. If you chase everyone off, and don’t want your activities to be filmed, I’d say that’s proof enough they were up to no good.
I’m missing something... I understand the order but how in a practical way is this supposed to work?
- Who exactly made up the inventory list?
- Should this order mean that the entire collection of documents has to be returned to PDJT and his lawyers to scrutinize page by page?
- Dearie refers to the “Detailed Property Inventory” but what is that? Is that just the list of the names of the files? What does agreeing or disagreeing with that list prove? What if there is a 100 page file that has had some additional sticky notes attached to them? How is that reflected in the inventory?
- How can Dearie prove that there was a sufficient chain of custody such that something that was planted wasn’t subsequently removed?
It was a question, not an allegation.
That's what the Clintons would say.
And they'd get a pass.
Pho-
To-
Shop
The layers of the scattered folders…..
There was no one to see what was going on. The rats kicked out everyone but the fib.
With DNA there are careful procedures to prove chain of custody.
If careful procedures are not also applied to chain of document custody, then the untraceable documents should not be admissible.
“… Dearie also asked Trump’s lawyers to identify any items that were seized by agents but not listed in the inventory. “This submission shall be Plaintiff’s final opportunity to raise any factual dispute as to the completeness and accuracy of the Detailed Property Inventory,” the judge wrote…”
********************************************************************
And, IMHO, this is the critical thing. Specifically, are the DOJ/FBI crooks not mentioning sensitive material seized that point to DOJ/FBI malfeasance (e.g., their involvement in the genesis, promotion and/or coverups of the many Russia-Russia-Russia hoaxes and other attempts to “get” or frame Trump)?
Why? It wouldn’t make any difference.
The deck is stacked. Another fraudulent persecution in progress.
Of course there will be some “newly discovered” classified documents that the Justice Department can’t even tell Trump’s lawyers about and can’t show the Special Master because national security.
Everyone was ordered to leave while the fbi spent hours going through Trumps estate. Nobody their was allowed to inventory what was taken. How is Trump supposed to prove what was taken, or added later?
Might as well be Yahoo or BusinessGlobalist Insider or Brett Baier.
Will there be ONE never Trumper (pretend) legal genius right on this thread?
BTW, all you breathless, panting never-Trump wishful thinkers, has he ever been proven wrong?