The judge’s order states that the phone was seized, the fbi would not provide proof of a search warrant, Eastman sued to get his property back since there was no evidence of a warrant. A hearing was set for Sep 6th. Meanwhile, the fbi replied that it was awaiting a second warrant to examine the contents of the phone. The judge accepting that claim of a 2nd warrant as proof that at least one warrant existed, canceled the hearing.
Not really standard procedure, I think.