DailyClout.io has a project going where about 3,000 volunteers (mostly War Room posse) & 250 or so lawyers, are going through all the Pfizer documents as they are being released (by court order).
The Daily Clout folks are issuing reports on their findings - I think they’re up to about 150. It’s all damning/devastating. Dr. Naomi Wolf (DailyClout is her tech website) appears several times a week, if not daily, on War Room with Steve Bannon, to go over the latest findings.
You can join as a volunteer to review docs, as an attorney (lawsuits forthcoming) or read the reports:
Pfizer Documents Analysis - WarRoom
https://campaigns.dailyclout.io/campaign/brand/cc3b3e5a-6536-4738-8ed6-5ee368c67240
Hey they only wanted to hide them for 75 years
We must trust them
safe AND effective
Will Twitter boot you off if you post these actual TRUE documents there? I’m guessing they will.
Hundreds of files to download on some website that is NOT Pfizer or the FDA, and no way to examine the contents before downloading? And the files are aimed at the same people who believe the conspiracies and misinformation regarding Covid? As if, maybe, those trying to get conservatives to die from Covid are also trying to destroy computers?
Sounds legit.
FYI, the results of vaccine trials are published in the medical literature. The actual data is publicly available to those who know how to look for it. Not that most of the people who fall for vaccine fear-mongering have any idea how to read clinical studies...
“As I have observed, those who plow iniquity and those who sow trouble reap the same.” ~Job 4:8
The liars at Pfizer are trying to stop a lawsuit that may prove they committed fraud in connection to their injections.
This wouldn’t be the first time they are found criminally liable for fraud.
See:
“Pfizer Inc. “Fraudulent Marketing”: “Largest Health Care Fraud Settlement in Its History” (2009). US Department of Justice”
“Pfizer cannot use the government as a shield from liability for making false claims about its COVID-19 vaccine, lawyers for a whistleblower argued in response to Pfizer’s motion to dismiss a False Claims Act lawsuit.
“Respondents claim fraudulent certifications, false statements, doctored data, contaminated clinical trials, and firing of whistleblowers can be ignored based on the theory that they contracted their way around the fraud,” lawyers for Brook Jackson, who worked as regional director at one of the clinical trials used to develop the Pfizer vaccine, wrote in their Aug. 22 response.
“A drug company cannot induce the taxpayers to pay billions of dollars for a product,” they countered, “that honest data would show poses more risks than benefits, and that ignores the actual contract and the law itself.”..”