The abortion ballet measure in Kansas had a turnout 25% higher than those that voted for their preferred US Senate candidate.
Safe to assume that additional 25% were Rats. Remove that component, the measure would not have passed.
21 posted on
08/17/2022 11:04:59 PM PDT by
Gene Eric
(Don't be a statist!)
To: BrexitBen; chris haney; IllumiNaughtyByNature; Be Careful; Maris Crane; Farcesensitive; basalt; ...
22 posted on
08/17/2022 11:10:50 PM PDT by
Gene Eric
(Don't be a statist!)
To: Gene Eric
We would have been better off if the Supreme Court waited until February 2023 to make its abortion ruling. I mean after 50 years, what’s six months.
26 posted on
08/18/2022 2:51:40 AM PDT by
napscoordinator
(Trump/Hunter, jr for President/Vice President 2016 democratic )
To: Gene Eric
The abortion ballet measure in Kansas had a turnout 25% higher than those that voted for their preferred US Senate candidate.
So wait. Are you saying that 25% of the "voters" showed up only to vote on the abortion ballot measure and nothing else? If that's the case, that explains why the measure passed so easily. Vote fraud...again.
36 posted on
08/18/2022 7:57:59 AM PDT by
Antoninus
(Republicans are all honorable men.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson