Posted on 08/11/2022 2:26:03 PM PDT by NoLibZone
A person close to the Trump family suggested the FBI may have planted “listening devices” during a raid targeting former President Donald Trump’s Florida residence earlier this week.
Lawyers for the former president previously said that FBI agents would not allow Trump’s team to observe or supervise their search of Mar-a-Lago in Palm Beach. One lawyer, Lindsey Halligan, told Fox News on Thursday that agents are believed to have searched Trump’s bedroom, office, and a storage room.
Because the FBI allegedly “didn’t allow anybody to supervise what they were doing, and they specifically requested to turn off the security cameras,” Kimbery Guilfoyle, Donald Trump Jr.’s fiancée and an advisor to the former president’s 2020 campaign, told Newsmax. “Why? Because they didn’t want to be caught with what they were doing. How do you know there weren’t listening devices planted or evidence planted there?
“It’s something that has to be investigated and checked out, and we want to see the affidavit and what was their probable cause to be able to go in there and break into the president’s home,” she added. For her claim, Guilfoyle did not provide evidence.
(Excerpt) Read more at theepochtimes.com ...
Listening devices - has Obama written all over it.
Obama loved the idea of listening in on everybody.
No the staff refused to turn them off but for much of the time they were off. Plus they got recordings from the cameras in June so the FBI knew any and all blind spots. Cameras do not cover all areas by any means there are countless places to plant bugs and cameras without being seen by the cameras even if they were on. The big one was they allowed no one in to watch them.
Remove them, but don’t destroy them. Put them in a soundproof box with recorded Trump speeches playing.
Time to ask Wray under oath if the FBI or its surrogates installed any electronic surveillance devices.
*************
He’ll just say he can’t comment on any ongoing investigation. Or he’ll say its necessary for personnel security.
He has a ready bag of evasive non-answers.
But his biggest out is that no one in congress will ask pointed questions. They’re all afraid of the FBI.
Well, if you know they’re listening, give them something to listen to. Have fun.
There are devices available that could jam any listening devices. Unfortunately, they would also screw up many communication items.
12–22–27
Well I am sure Trump has hired people who can find them and disable them, if they were planted.
I thought the same thing immediately.
Thats true
And they can all be discovered. With enough diligence from tech savvy people.
They spied on Trump before, during, and after.
Pfffttt. Trump knows guys who do Oval Office sweeps for Soviet bugs, much less FBI cameras and bugs. Anyway, if Trump had set this up, he’d have another duplicate camera system where the ones the FBI shut down was a decoy.
They would be on surveillance cameras doing so. Would they risk so much?
If you really wanted to be cruel you'd put them in a box with an endless loop of 0bama's speeches.
They may be lefties who support the Jug-Eared Miracle Worker but nobody could stand to listen to that.
No. The a-hole who wrote the hit piece is.
.
They got FISA warrants.. no doubt
I’ve been saying it.
Electronic Surveillance via agencies
Yes. I was referring to the leftwingnut who accused her of forwarding lies.
Suspicious looking nerd visitor: “Uh, could you repeat that into my wrist watch? Or step closer to the vase over here?”
Buttigieg: If they try that with me I'll volunteer to hand search them.
I hope to God that the Trump Team is able to find them and remove them to prove damage. This constitutes a form of damage to Mar-a-lago. Such damage would mean a considerable damage lawsuit that I wouldn’t think is protected. They violated the 4th Amendment.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.