Replies

I think you meant blue state, where the reds are.

I agree with you. I’ve been trying to warn folks also.

In theory that is supposed not to be possible, but haven’t people
noticed by now the Communists do not adhere to the constitution?

What part of this have our people missed in recent years.

Subversion is the only constant now.

I agree that lawlessness on the part of the left (and some on the part of the right) is a real threat to any lawful society.

My own conviction is to insist on law, argue it, and be willing to use force if the lawless insist on lawlessness.

Just hoping for a magical leader who will pull us all out of this is a vain hope, I think.

I do find it odd that the very specified solution to this problem of centralized power contained in the Constitution itself is viewed with such fear. This very activity is the essence of "being Constitutional."

I know I can be hateful and contemptuous when people ignore the Constitution in the name of protecting it, but it seems utterly ridiculous to me.

Article V is NOT a "in case of fire break glass" kind of last ditch thing to save us IN CASE power devolved to the fed. It was actually meant to be a part of the process of maintaining the balance of powers. (so said the authors).

Failure to "follow the Constitution" is what got us to this mess. I am in favor of actually doing what folks in here seem to be advocating with one side of the mouth, while actually denying what the document specifies.