Posted on 07/24/2022 1:27:54 PM PDT by elpadre
Since when do CIA directors have any credibility?
For tyrannies to become established an external enemy is necessary, even if you have to just make one up.
“Our best intelligent judgement”
I stopped there.
We seem to be getting conflicting “stories” on this matter. There’s this, then there is the constant “Iran is x weeks from nuking Israel” side of it. You’d like to believe that our -makers have the truth. I wonder.
When do CIA directors have zero credibility?
When they open their mouths.
Or, maybe he’s lying now
The author of this site is obviously Russian. And here is the important part - excerpted:
“..But in order for diplomacy to really advance and to materialize in agreements, it is not enough to admit that the nuclear weapons narrative is false, it is necessary that all sanctions be banned, and that Washington removes the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) from its list of terrorist organizations, in addition to establishing a truly neutral and impartial nuclear monitoring mechanism that does not act in an interventionist manner or violate Iranian sovereignty. Until this is achieved, there will be no concrete possibility of agreement...”
Iran is terrorist central and has been since the Revolution of 1979.
There seems to be a low-level war going on between Mossad and Iran, on Iranian soil. Trying to slow or stop a nuclear program that doesn’t exist?
I think it’s more likely this guy is lying.
Iran just bragged about the amount of enriched uranium they have. And about their ability to enrich it further very quickly.
How did they get this material and capability if they are not working towards a bomb.
And given their repeated, and continued statements that they intend to wipe out Israel. And given their support of terrorism. The benefit of the doubt should go against Iran.
Burns is bringing a huge charge! Shouldn’t the word “alleges” be used instead of “admits?” Previous portrayers certainly have rights.
Let the Mossad do it’s thing. They may have stopped their nukes but when you look at what’s coming out of their mouths that’s enough to off a few of their key people.
So we should believe the CIA now? Sorry, not me. I think they lie when they choose and that may be with this statement. You really cannot trust them. Sad to say.
I assume that Burns will be in front of the Intel Committee tomorrow morning so he can explain this... Guessing not.
BINGO!
I guess I’ll read the final report by the light of the mushroom cloud.....
I’m so tired of being lied to by everyone in this “government”
There is no way refining the highly enriched uranium isn’t a dead giveaway that a nuclear program is underway....these statements are lies to enable the new policy of signing a new deal with Iran.
But in order for diplomacy to really advance and to materialize in agreements, it is not enough to admit that the nuclear weapons narrative is false, it is necessary that all sanctions be banned, and that Washington removes the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) from its list of terrorist organizations, in addition to establishing a truly neutral and impartial nuclear monitoring mechanism that does not act in an interventionist manner or violate Iranian sovereignty. Until this is achieved, there will be no concrete possibility of agreement.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.