[Qui is]

Well, there is also the Supreme Court ruling that states Law Enforcement does not have a duty / is not required to protect the lives of citizens.

And thus, that’s all the reason needed to justify the 2nd Amendment.

[stanne]

“ Well, there is also the Supreme Court ruling that states Law Enforcement does not have a duty / is not required to protect the lives of citizens.”

Blah blah blah

Does it allow those same police to then also block family from saving the victim?

[egfowler3]

“Well, there is also the Supreme Court ruling that states Law Enforcement does not have a duty / is not required to protect the lives of citizens.”

Maybe so, but just because they don’t have a “duty...” or “...is not required to...” does not mean they cannot voluntarily exterminate the vermin.