Dramatic stats. I do not like her citation (sloppy journalism) because there is none, but she does quote from Steve Kirsch and Dr. Robert Malone, among others.
You do not just “get” late stage pancreatic cancer.
You want some unverifiable anecdotal evidence?
No one in my extended family that has been fully vaccinated has died. 22 people.
I have an 86 year old uncle that died from Covid 19. He took one vaccine shot but had not yet taken the other before he got Covid and died.
I have been double vaxxed and boosted. So has my 95 year old father. We are waiting for the omicron booster this fall for the next booster shot.
Waiting for the democrat/media/big pharma/Faux-xi cheerleaders on here to say the death serum is perfectly safe with 98% efficacy.
Deep State Psy-ops to make people who aren’t hysterically scared of Covid hysterically scared of the (ineffective) vaccines.
People have to hysterically scared of something.
Now on to my other gripe. People who don't proof read articles. They only use spell check because they are lazy.
That would mean 300 million people have been "effected" HUH?
Our healthy immune system fights off invaders, including errant cancer cells all the time. As we age, our immune system doesn’t work as well as it did when we were younger and that’s why most cancers are seen as we age. (Obviously some cancers can/do happen at younger ages, even children 😢). Perhaps vaccines are destroying or impairing the immune system and it is no longer able to do it’s job properly? Previous cancers in remission come back, or new cancers thrive and become aggressive?? And maybe repeated boosters keep immune system hyper- primed, but only for Spike Protein/Covid and it isn’t able to do it’s job properly towards other invaders??
I do believe we were warned by numerous people that this might happen...
No fake vaxes in my house.
That said, what little I have anecdotally is mixed. My socialist BIL (76) and his communist wife (69) have had 3 jabs - maybe 4 since he told me they were getting that as soon as it was available - and I assume old people get priority. Nothing untoward with them so far. He had a slow growing prostate cancer before Jabs 1 though 4 and his last PSA was unchanged. I don’t know about her because I don’t ask. I don’t care about her.
I have talked to people who claim to have close family members died or disabled after the Jab. That’s hardly dependable.
More than 5 BILLION people have been injected with that experimental crap?! So, about 1/3 of the population will be around once all the vaxxed drop dead? Wow. Gonna be a whole lot of room for the pure bloods!
This pretty well coincides with the Deagle report. Below is just an excerpt as the complete article is quite long, If you like the complete article ask for it and I will send it or you can find it on the internet.
2025 Deagel Forecast: 70% Population Reduction In USA And The Collapse Of The West
by Doug Casey
Deagel is a private online source for the military capabilities of the world’s nation-states. It recently released a shocking five-year forecast.
The report analyzes countries by projected population size, GDP, defense budget, and more.
In it, they predict a 70% reduction in the size of the United States population. This is a bold prediction. What are your thoughts on this?
Doug Casey: I’ve got to say that I wasn’t familiar with Deagel — it keeps a low profile. Deagel is in the same business as Jane’s — which has been in the business of analyzing weapons systems for many decades.
A look at the Deagel website, which is quite sophisticated, makes it clear we’re not dealing with some blogger concocting outrageous clickbait. It seems to be well-connected with defense contractors and government agencies like the CIA.
They’ve predicted that about 70% of the US population, and about the same percentage in Europe, is going to disappear by 2025. It’s hard to believe that anybody in their position would make a forecast like that. There’s no logical business reason for it, especially since it was done before the COVID hysteria gripped the world. It stretches a reader’s credulity.
Could it possibly happen? It would be the biggest thing in world history. Does it have a basis in reality, or is it just some bizarre trolling exercise?
I’m not sure — it’s hard to take almost anything from any source at face value these days. But for the last several years, I’ve been saying that World War III would basically be a biological war. Of course, it will have substantial conventional, nuclear, space-based, and AI/computer elements as well, but its most serious component will be biological.
Essentially, it will involve the use of bacteria and viruses to wipe out the enemy. The odds are that it will be between the US and China. But since anyone with a CRISPR in their garage can hack the genome and DNA of almost anything and anybody… there are no limits to the possibilities.
Certainly, from the Chinese point of view, a biological war makes all the sense in the world. That’s because the Han Chinese share a lot of genetic similarities. Presumably, a bacteria or virus can be bred to favor the Chinese and take out most everybody else. The fact is that anything that can be done eventually will be done. It’s just the law of large numbers.
Somebody might respond, “Well, that’s horribly racist.” Of course it’s racist. Notwithstanding rational and philosophical arguments against it, all ethnic groups and countries are quite naturally racist. A fear of different racial and ethnic groups has been bred into humans, as a survival mechanism, over the hundreds of thousands of years since we became biologically modern.
All races and ethnic groups like to think that they’re “the best” or the most worthy, and that non-members are “other”, perhaps only marginally human. Biological warfare plays directly into feeling.
Americans who — like everybody else — see themselves as “the good guys”, believe we’re immune to that. However, don’t forget that the US pioneered modern biowarfare.
Fort Detrick, Maryland, has been an epicenter of it for over 70 years, and there are undoubtedly many other more clandestine sites where US government agencies are working on biological warfare. No doubt the Chinese and other major powers are working clandestinely as well. It’s not something anybody wants to advertise for many reasons.
What shocks me is not that a biowar is being researched or even actively wargamed, but that a connected organization like Deagel is actually saying it publicly. It’s not like what goes on in the spook community is an open book.
Deagel doesn’t explicitly say what, exactly, will cause the great die-off. But there are many advantages to biological warfare over other types of warfare, so it will probably be featured. It’s probably inevitable, now that the technology has made it practical.
What are the advantages of biowar? What might wargaming generals like about it?
First, it doesn’t destroy materiel. That’s a huge plus. After all, what’s the point of conquering a country if all you have to show for it is a smoking radioactive ruin? That’s the major advantage of the neutron bomb, of course; it kills the people but limits damage to buildings. Bioweapons essentially make atomic weapons obsolescent.
Second, bioweapons can be structured to attack only certain racial groups. That’s potentially either a big advantage or disadvantage to China. The diverse population of the US could also be either an advantage or a disadvantage, depending on who strikes first. But, on the bright side, you can perhaps immunize your own population, or at least the military and “essential” workers, to control the damage.
Third, bioweapons are very cheap and easy to fabricate. Anyone with access to a good high school chemistry lab is in business. There’s no need for expensive and tricky U-235 or, for that matter, any of the junk toys the Pentagon spends hundreds of billions on.
Fourth, bioweapons don’t need sophisticated delivery systems; again, no need for B-2s, B-52s, cruise missiles, ICBMs, or any of that. A sick tourist or two, or a few packages sent in the mail, can get the job done.
Fifth, bioweapons, whether they’re viruses or bacteria, not only offer plausible deniability but the potential to blame a third party. You can launch an attack, and nobody can really be sure who did it. Or even that an attack is, in fact, being launched.
There’s every advantage to biological warfare from an aggressor’s point of view. And, the aggressor doesn’t even have to be a nation-state, which is, of course, another excuse for governments to further clamp down on their populations, as COVID has shown. Guns are good self-defense weapons, and governments are trying to eliminate them; basement biowar labs are strictly offensive. Imagine the bureaucratic enforcement possibilities.
International Man: In addition, Deagel included a lengthy disclaimer, which states:
“After COVID, we can draw two major conclusions:
1. The Western world success model has been built over societies with no resilience that can barely withstand any hardship, even a low-intensity one. It was assumed, but we got the full confirmation beyond any doubt.
2. The COVID crisis will be used to extend the life of this dying economic system through the so-called Great Reset.”
I have had Covid twice. The first time I wound up in the hospital with a small blood clot (after lying on my back for a week with extreme fatigue). The second time only very minor symptoms. I believe that my relatively strong immune system has helped me to fend off Covid.
I do not plan on getting the jab ever. I trust my body and my God and not the questionable science and political manipulation that surround this “pandemic”.
Just found out my vaccinated co-worker is in the hospital with Covid...he said they can’t get his oxygen to stabilize.....very upsetting....
They are running radio ads in my area telling people to get checked for myocarditis. The ad says it is sponsored by Pfizer.
They might think it’s going to be too big to hide much longer, if they are now paying for ads.
Meanwhile, the BBC is still at it...