House Speaker Reacts to Supreme Court Decision Overturning Roe v. Wade

C-Span ^ | 6/24/22 | Nancy Pelosi

[DallasBiff]

House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-CA) condemns the Supreme Court’s decision to overturn Roe v. wade, calling it “outrageous.” She also criticizes the justices who testified in their confirmation hearings that they respected stare decisis

[cuz1961]

She claims this criminalizes a
woman’s “right” to an abortion

/\

She also claimed Republicans aim to pass federal law against abortion

Guess she can’t read or hear

S.C. ruled ,,,
,,,,,no fed power ,,,,,,,over state prerogative.

[Amendment10]

Regarding no express constitutional protection for unthinkingly murdering unborn Democratic voters, contrast the desperate Democratic, politically correct “right” to abortion with the protections that the very enumerated 2nd Amendment has famously provided for gun owners.

Insights welcome.

Also, Trump’s red tsunami of patriot supporters are reminded that they must vote twice this election year. Your first vote is to primary career RINO incumbents. Your second vote is to replace outgoing Democrats and RINOs with Trump-endorsed patriot candidates.

Again, insights welcome.

[equaviator]

Some women insist on being in control of their “own” bodies, but why do we sometimes hear them say that they’re “eating for two” when they’re pregnant?

[adorno]

She says yesterday SCOTUS ruled that States can’t dictate constitutional rights and today they ruled against it.

She believes that if somebody in congress or in the White House calls something unconstitutional, therefore it is unconstitutional. She also believes that if somebody in power calls something constitutional (though not in the constitution), therefore it is.

The ruling on guns is about a constitutional right, granted in the constitution and since the country was founded (or shortly thereafter).

The abortion ruling is about a states right issue, where if something is not specifically a right under the U.S. constitution, it is a state-level decision to be made, and not by a federal court or a federal law.

Pelosi is either ignorant of the constitution, or deliberately lying about the constitution. She knows that a lot of people in the U.S. don't know what is or not in the constitution, and hopes she can reach those ignorant people with her absurdly wrong rhetoric.

Every time somebody in power calls something constitutional or not constitutional, they should be challenged on the veracity of her/his statements.

[antidemoncrat]

Devout Catholic? Better described as a high ranking official in Satan’s Army.

[Still Thinking]

Overturning precedent is only for liberals! When they do it, it can even be something that’s been in place for hundreds of years, not just 50.

[CodeToad]

Nancy’s uterus dried into a prune 75 years ago.

[CIB-173RDABN]

brace for all the noise to stack the court. I think that is a real possibility now.

---

They may have the desire but they don’t have the time.

The mid-term election is a little more then four months from now and I think Congress’s summer recess is coming up.

[Lazamataz]

I never listen to Pelosi.

Except today.

Because I am enjoying her anguish.

[Secret Agent Man]

Well Nanzis love their abortion.

[Tommy Revolts]

Eat shit and bark at the moon Nancy. You're evil.

No way should there be a "Constitutional" right to commit murder.

It is the killing of a human being created in the image of God.

[EEGator]

Thank you.

[GOPJ]

This ruling means that States make the call on abortion. Liberal states will allow abortion. So Pelosi’s husband’s mistress (if he has one) can dump the product of the affair... And Garland? Who knows what his problem is... too much hatred of everyday Americans is my guess.

[justme4now]

Pelosi is doing exactly what she and her kangaroo court is trying Trump on .. exciting insurrection!😡
Even Jonathan Turley said so!😊

[Allegra]

Incoherently spewing venomous hate. That’s Nancy for ya.

[Tommy Revolts]

We should be protecting the unborn, not killing them.

Good Lord.

[Ahithophel]

[Pelosi] says yesterday SCOTUS ruled that States can’t dictate constitutional rights and today they ruled against it.

Madame Speaker assumes facts not in evidence: Unlike right to bear arms, right to abortion never mentioned in the Constitution.

Justice Alito writing in today's Dobbs decision:

For the first 185 years after the adoption of the Constitution, each State was permitted to address this issue in accordance with the views of its citizens. Then, in 1973, this Court decided Roe v. Wade, 410 U. S. 113. Even though the Constitution makes no mention of abortion, the Court held that it confers a broad right to obtain one. It did not claim that American law or the common law had ever recognized such a right, and its survey of history ranged from the constitutionally irrelevant (e.g., its discussion of abortion in antiquity) to the plainly incorrect (e.g., its assertion that abortion was probably never a crime under the common law). After cataloging a wealth of other information having nobearing on the meaning of the Constitution, the opinion concluded with a numbered set of rules much like those that might be found in a statute enacted by a legislature.

Under this scheme, each trimester of pregnancy was regulated differently, but the most critical line was drawn atroughly the end of the second trimester, which, at the time,corresponded to the point at which a fetus was thought toachieve “viability,” i.e., the ability to survive outside thewomb. Although the Court acknowledged that States had a legitimate interest in protecting “potential life,”1 it found that this interest could not justify any restriction on previability abortions. The Court did not explain the basis for this line, and even abortion supporters have found it hard to defend Roe’s reasoning. (emphasis added) (footnote omitted).

[imardmd1]

Nancy may be a Catholic, but she's certainly not a Christian, according to Jesus the Master of all true believers:

"And they brought unto him also infants, that he would touch them: but when his disciples saw it, they rebuked them.  But Jesus called them unto him, and said, Suffer little children to come unto me, and forbid them not: for of such is the kingdom of God. Verily I say unto you, Whosoever shall not receive the kingdom of God as a little child shall in no wise enter therein" (Luke 18:15-17 AV)

But she would never admit that, would she? Hypocrite, IMHO. Apostle Paul wrote according to the Spirit of God:

"Now the Spirit speaketh expressly, that in the latter times some shall depart from the faith, giving heed to seducing spirits, and doctrines of devils;  Speaking lies in hypocrisy; having their conscience seared with a hot iron;  Forbidding to marry, and commanding to abstain from meats^{(various foods)}, which God hath created to be received with thanksgiving of them which believe and know the truth" (1 Timothy 4:1-3 AV)

Seems to me that describes Nancy and every single one of the hundreds of legislators and media writers/publishers that support her stance, which is:

Kill the unborn human children, you inconvenienced mothers!" < /sarc >

[Still Thinking]

The entire abortion debate is about the government making stoopid people not responsible for their own actions.

To be fair, stupid people is government's constituency. We normals don't need it.

[Allegra]

Not for long. Now where are the Republicans saying this was the right and correct decision?

Yeah, where’s Mitch? Nancy hissed his name.