Posted on 06/24/2022 8:17:16 AM PDT by SeekAndFind
*The U.S. Supreme Court Overturns Roe vs Wade, effectively ending Federal Recognition of a Constitutional right to abortion and giving individual states in the union the power to allow, limit and ban the practice altogether.*
(Excerpt) Read more at foxnews.com ...
Wow, that black woman holding the sign “Killing our own babies is a democrat birthing person’s right!” has a badly deformed brain, undoubtedly the result of K-12 indoctrination and brainwashing and a poor moral education by her parent. “Birthing person”? She has certainly taken her dose of Kool-Aid via the Big Gulp route!
Apparently two separate opinions. 5-4 overturn Roe, 6-3 to uphold the Mississippi law. The latter was what we were expecting, which would have been a major victory in the right direction, we said at the time.
A pregnant woman takes a bus ride from Utah to Nevada, for example, and her fetus magically changes from a human being to a clump of cells when the bus goes over the state line.
All the hate, anger, lies, Russia collusion stories, and impeachments served no purpose! Thank you Trump for willingly undergoing those tortures to get R v W overturned!
An affirmation of States’ Rights
Its the only way to control Woke DC Fedzilla, and confront the DOJ/KGB>>>
States don’t have rights. Rights are God given to humans. Humans delegate powers to governments to provide security,etc.
Yep.
Carry your guns, people.
It’s about to get loud.
Once again, Thank you President Trump!
It is more accurate than 90 % of the headlines. While not really there, the "right" was federally recognized anyway.
Trump Legacy. If hillary had won, it would’ve been the opposite for sure.
And the Dow is up +660.15 (+2.15%). If it was the opposite we would be hearing nonstop that the market wants abortion.
Just like the Media was beating the fear drums trying to get the Dow to go down the day after the Trump win. Oops.
Rather than overturn Roe v. Wade altogether, Roberts said he would have continued to recognize a right to get an abortion, and that the right should “extend far enough to ensure a reasonable opportunity to choose, but need not extend any further.”
Meaningless doublespeak drivel.>>> Yes Truly communist. Rights are God given and cannot be legislated. Nor can one person’s right compel another person to perform some action. Especially a medical procedure.
If states are allowed to decide who is or isn't a human being, then states should also be allowed to decide who is or isn't a citizen.
States could then enforce their own definition of citizen and forcibly remove the Obama "children" that were allowed or transported into their borders.
“No doubt, and this is a great ruling. But I’m not convinced it’s really a matter of states’ rights. If an unborn baby is really a human being, the protection of its life is a constitutional, hence federal, matter.”
Indeed.
Right. To. Life.>>> And States cannot nor did they ever have rights.
"States don’t have rights."
What the F...?
Children have rights which compel their guardians to feed, clothe, and shelter them.
So, no, there are rights that some people have that compel other people to do things.
The NAP is silly.
Libertarianism is a mental disorder.
I don’t know for sure, but I think she made the sign to put into words exactly what abortion is and who loves it.
So abort is a Constitutional right
but our guns is not? BS!
Sounds like one of the issues that led to the U.S. Civil War ... apart from those intolerable tariffs, of course.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.