This decision says nothing about birthing persons, so it further gives legal basis for what a woman and by extension the definition of what man is.
Jumper wrote:
“
This decision says nothing about birthing persons, so it further gives legal basis for what a woman and by extension the definition of what man is.
“
DoodleDawg wrote:
“
Can challenges to Obergfell be far behind? I doubt that many people will want 50 years of gay marriage to go by.
“
Maybe ‘gay marriage ‘ is next to be struck down, using Jumper’s reasoning.