It was that exact moment in time Trump won me over after hating him for 20 years.
WE DID IT!!!!!!!
OUTSTANDING!!!
THANK YOU JESUS!!!!
Thanks be to God.
Well, two biggies down (Roe and NY Gun Rights case). I’m on the lookout for the W.VA vs EPA case which could severly limit the right of Federal Agencies to unilaterally impost rules and sanctions. Hopefully the SCOTUS will say that Congress actually has to pass specific laws dealing with issues instead of letting bureaucrats create law out of thin air.
My only concern now is that either the "Jan 6 commission" or some bitterly ambitious DA somewhere will bring a cooked up indictment against President Trump as a vengeance move against Trump for appointing the SC justices that made this all possible.
Perhaps I am "tin-foil hatting" here, but I don't see these clowns on the left taking this lying down. They need to raise money for the mid-terms.
Now that it will go back to the states, it’s time for all of us to roll our sleeves up and join/rejoin/redouble the fight. We’ve still got work to do. We may not be able to completely eradicate abortion, but even one baby saved is worth it.
To our God be the glory!
TRUMP put it All on the Line for unborn children. While The "aristocrats" never broke a Sweat. pic.twitter.com/REg2yMQfiG— G Raymond Kelly (@gregkellyusa) June 24, 2022
Liberals receive second kick to the groin good news.
Is this 6-3 or 5-4 decision? Drudge is reporting 5-4 yet I see that Roberts concurred so it appears 6-3.
I tip my hat to the Trump nominees, who withstood the pressure, and stood tall for gun rights and restricting abortion.
My mother and father who dutifully walked infront of the abortion clinic will be ecstatic in heaven....God bless them and all they did in their quiet way..
Plus it’s murder.
No state should be permitted to legalize murder.
So namby-pamby Roberts voted to uphold MS but not to overturn Roe. So media will trumpet 5-4 instead of also saying 6-3 .... what a wuss he is.
Praise You, Father! In Jesus’ Name! It’s the Year of Jubilee!
Roe v. Wade and Casey today, Lawrence and Obergefell tomorrow.
Well, I think I was convinced early in life that there was never anything in the Constitution concerning abortion. I am not a Constitutional scholar or anything close. How is it that I can understand this yet so many in our Congress (and our general population) don’t seem to be able to? They are supposed to be the learned ones governing our nation, yet their only redeeming qualification seems to be that they had the money to run for office. They take an oath to defend our Constitution as I understand, so why are they not summarily dismissed when they refuse to do this? Now the USSC has struck down Roe vs Wade & so many will not agree with this. What do they not understand?
mplicitly protect the right.>>>> Rights are God given. and cannot compel one person to act for another.
The narrative has been and always will be perverted. No there is not even a “right“ to abortion. So the left is using language that doesn’t exist.
I’m watching Fox. They’re talking about trigger laws. Suddenly occurred to me that limiting abortion to the abortion pill is a great way to keep libiots from moving to your state. We can call them stay in California laws.