Doesn’t work like that.
She claimed he negligently transmitted the disease. So she sued the man.
His insurance company owed him indemnity because the negligence arose in relation to the use of the vehicle, just like if he hit someone with it.
There are loading/unloading cases like this with drill pipe (pipe falls off truck when loading because someone was being an idiot).
His homeowners’ insurance probably would pay, too, if he nailed her at his house, just like if you negligently harm someone in your house.
Notice it didn’t hit the homosexual community spreading
a disease far and wide at bath houses.
The man did not hit the woman with his car. His car was not
involved with the transmission of the disease. Some flaw in
his vehicle didn’t inflict this on her.
She did by using poor judgment.
If she thinks she can get funds from his investments/assets
fine. This is not the same thing at all.
As I said, every woman who contracted VD at a hotel would
then be able to go after the hotel.
Just nonsense...
I appreciate your attempt at a rational response, but I’m
not buying.