All she did was give her opinion about the election. That's it. Her opinion about the election doesn't prove Trump led an insurrection.
She gave them nothing.
She should not have accepted Barrs statement
Liz Harrington said yesterday that we will hear a lot of “doctored” and edited words from this spectacle. I am waiting to hear and see what was cut out and added in and edited before forming an opinion. The libtards are not above any rotten, dishonest tricks. We should all know that by now.
And that was her sole goal of this "testimony", so she couldn't be attacked for not complying and she provided zero legal fodder. It was actually smart to hang it on the credibility of the bagpiper, which has since been blown wide open.