Replies

This is the kicker in the article:

She was originally scheduled to appear on May 12, 2022, and plead “not guilty,” however, the plea has been changed because of the evidence presented in True The Vote’s “2000 Mules”.

So yes, while this is but one case, 2000 mules proves this case. If it proves this case, it should prove other cases also. Yet they won't investigate, because it's data like this that they want buried. It shows fraud was committed on a massive scale in Az. as well as, the other swing states.

Instead of poo pooing 2000 Mules, everyone should be demanding investigations. But too many choose to remain silent and continue exhibiting skepticism, which is exactly what they want to happen as a result of their inaction regarding the theft of an election.

As long as people take that attitude, we all might just as well stop voting, and allow this country to slide into communism. Because unlike a murder case, there are too many to make the case against, because there is no DNA, no blood spatter, only geo-tracking which too many apparently have little faith in. Now they know they can get away with election theft, and communism will be ushered in.

This country is no longer home of the free or land of the brave. It's just another 3rd world sh!thole.

I don't know. She was under indictment for a year, and one of the parties involved had already pled guilty. To be credible, it would be good to see 2,000 Mules identify someone that wasn't already under investigation.

Also, there's always the tried and true way to look at this: follow the money.

Fox and NewsMax haven't brought up 2,000 Mules. Why? I've seen some claim that these outlets hate Trump, but that's silly talk. A documentary with conclusive evidence of voter fraud would be a ratings bonanza for these networks. There's only one possible reason they wouldn't cover these claims - the same reason they backed off the Dominion angle.

It's because the claims don't have any empirical backing and could put them in jeopardy of a massive lawsuit.