Seriously, throwing “access to contraceptives” into this article is about as deceptive as anything can be. There is no case before the Supreme Court or any body of jurisprudence concerning the use or access to contraceptives, but the writer can claim that abortion is a form of contraceptive so he can add that into this screed.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Griswold_v._Connecticut was a precedent for Roe etc.
It is not. “contra-” means against. “-ceptive” refers to conception. With abortion, conception has already occurred so it can’t be a contraceptive.
only if you change the definition of contraception
so he is outright lying