Posted on 05/13/2022 2:26:59 PM PDT by NoLibZone
A Russian lawmaker is warning Friday that recent comments from Poland’s leaders are encouraging Moscow to "put it in first place in the queue for denazification after Ukraine."
Russian State Duma Deputy Oleg Morozov, using language Russia has sought to justify its bloody invasion of Ukraine, made the remark on his Telegram page, according to Russian state media.
"By its statements about Russia as a 'cancer tumor' and about the 'indemnity' that we must pay to Ukraine, Poland encourages us to put it in first place in the queue for denazification after Ukraine," Morozov reportedly wrote.
(Excerpt) Read more at foxnews.com ...
“denazification”
Poland?
Unimaginable choice of words.
Poland knows about Russia and Germany, better than anyone else in Europe.
No Nazi’s run Poland.
No Commies run Poland.
Poland is one of the oldest US Allies.
Poland is a Member of NATO.
Russian “politicians” can pound sand.
FACTS.
To those who feign concern about the New World order.
Xi refers to Putin as his bossom buddy.
The same philosophy that uses the term denazification uses the term tiki torch carrying white supremacists.
“Yes, if attacked, Poland would kick Russian butts more.”
With what, their WW2 Calvary? They didn’t do too well then and like the rest of NATO didn’t bother with having military, since the Cold War was ‘over’.
In any case, it’s far more likely that once Donbas is fully liberated, Poland will cut a deal with Russia to carve up Ukraine and get Lviv back, at least per the recent rumors.
He insists we use YOUR tongue to spread the oil, NoLibZone.
A little bit eccentric, if you ask me...
I don’t carry a torch. But I do know about carrying a weapon.
My neighbors do too.
FACT.
The calvary were quite effective when used as Poland did against the Germans, that is until your Russian buddies stabbed them in the back.
Poland is a member of NATO, as is the U.S.
Per Article 5 of the North Atlantic Treaty:
"It commits each member state to consider an armed attack against one member state, in Europe or North America, to be an armed attack against them all. Upon such attack, each member state is to assist by taking "such action as [the member state] deems necessary, including the use of armed force, to restore and maintain the security of the North Atlantic area."
Ukraine is not a NATO member, so there is no such obligation.
Thank you for the info.
Interesting:
https://www.timesunion.com/local/article/Scott-Ritter-paroled-in-online-sex-case-5936227.php
Big talk for a country that is essentially getting its behind handed to them.
Probably somewhere watching you Biden/Soros/Schwab kids “slobber Ukraini”
The US has no more interests in Poland than it does in Ukraine.
No real interests at all.
And no POTUS would ever get a majority of the American people to go to war with Russia over Poland.
So the warmongers can fluff and puff as much as it suits them. But I suspect Poland can read the tea leaves and knows, NATO or not, the US will not go to existential war for them.
“Mongols, stop spreading that nonsense. I would rather cut off my own dick than have anything to do with that. Go Ukes. Death to the rus pigs !”
Actually the rumors are out of the West.
In any case, we’ll soon find out if they’re true.
Arrests and conviction for sex offences
Ritter was the subject in two law enforcement sting operations in 2001.[30] He was charged in June 2001 with trying to set up a meeting with an undercover police officer posing as a 16-year-old girl.
[31][32] He was charged with a misdemeanor crime of “attempted endangerment of the welfare of a child”. The charge was dismissed and the record was sealed after he completed six months of probation.[32][3] After this information was made public in early 2003, Ritter said that the timing of the leak was politically motivated in order to silence his opposition to the Bush administration’s push toward war with Iraq.[31][32][33]
Ritter was arrested again in November 2009[34] over communications with a police decoy he met on an Internet chat site. Police said that he exposed himself, via a web camera, after the officer repeatedly identified himself as a 15-year-old girl.[16] Ritter said in his own testimony during the trial that he believed the other party was an adult acting out her fantasy.[2]
The next month, Ritter waived his right to a preliminary hearing and was released on a $25,000 unsecured bail. Charges included “unlawful contact with a minor, criminal use of a communications facility, corruption of minors, indecent exposure, possessing instruments of crime, criminal attempt and criminal solicitation”.
[35] Ritter rejected a plea bargain and was found guilty of all but the criminal attempt count in a courtroom in Monroe County, Pennsylvania, on April 14, 2011.[16][36] In October 2011, he received a sentence of 1½ to 5½ years in prison.[37] He was sent to Laurel Highlands state prison in Somerset County, Pennsylvania, in March 2012 and paroled in September 2014.[1]
And Putin "defends Christianity" in Russia the same way DemonRATS in America are trying to "protect our democracy"
Good one! Hard to visualize tho. 🤮
It wasn’t an alliance in a ‘friendly’ sense. More like two warring mafioso defining the boundaries of the turf war. Poland’s geography means it got shafted by two totalitatarian dictatorships. Stalin’s goal appears to have been to buy some time by creating strategic depth before Germans could bust into the pre pact borders of the Soviet Union. The planning for operation that became Barbarossa in june 41 was on the table in october 1940. Stalin would have known this. However he ignored his general staff’s advice that that the onslaught would come through Belorussia (which it did) and focused on a main thrust through the UKSSR. So Stalin probably bought a little time at Poland and elsewhere’s expense, but threw some of it away due to initial tone deafness
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.