“I was referring to the lease of 1898.”
Obviously, since it is the only one.
I will repeat.
And read the Joint Declaration. It is not based on the New Territories lease expiring.
“the lease was unfortunately fully legal for China to end”
Groundless assertion. I say ludicrous.
And the proof is ChiComs did not end the lease, the exchange was not based on CCP ending the lease.
How could they?
Interesting and accurate points. Thank you.
I’m going to go back and read more — you’ve proven my above statements as wrong. Thank you