Posted on 05/10/2022 3:05:28 PM PDT by ChicagoConservative27
White House press secretary Jen Psaki said Tuesday that the Biden administration encourages “peaceful” protests outside the homes of Supreme Court justices, despite the fact that such protests aim to intimidate the judiciary and appear to be illegal.
(Excerpt) Read more at breitbart.com ...
Peacefully illegal and a felony.
It’s the old, you guys did it so that makes it okay for us to do it. It equates an abortion clinic with a Supreme Court Justice’s personal home. Apply the law.
But opposes peaceful protests outside of abortion clinics.
The whole G’D regime should be arrested and charged with sedition.
and yet, Groot won’t even let protestors on her street...
Calling all BLM and Antifa. She knows what she is doing.. Your not going to change the decision..
This is harassment and intimidation and she knows it.
Nancy Pelosi nearly admitted it herself.
IMHO this was the entire point of leaking the draft opinion. They wanted to intimidate, by hook or by crook, the Supremes into changing their final, published decision.
Separation of powers. She controls the cops. Judges don't.
Typical intramural spat.
And that Bastard Roberts could end it today by releasing the ruling. So he is fine with putting the Justices through hell to “soften them up”.
She is giving them legal cover. Anyone charged with illegal protesting would just have to play the president's official spokeswoman encouraging them to do it.
Mostly peaceful protests without much blood.
18 USC § 1507.
"Whoever, with the intent of interfering with, obstructing, or impeding the administration of justice, or with the intent of influencing any judge, juror, witness, or court officer, in the discharge of his duty, pickets or parades in or near a building housing a court of the United States, or in or near a building or residence occupied or used by such judge, juror, witness, or court officer, or with such intent uses any sound-truck or similar device or resorts to any other demonstration in or near any such building or residence, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than one year, or both."
Law professor Eugene Volokh on this subject:
18 USC 1507
OBAMA started this when he was with ACORN. They were protesting outside the homes of bank officers to intimidate and force them to make high risk loans. This had a lot to do with the economic crash in 08 and 09.
There should be peaceful protests outside obama’s home on Martha’s Vineyard. Why not? He’s the one that started most of the problems we’re having now.
Fox News today was saying that’s a crime.
Whoever, with the intent of interfering with, obstructing, or impeding the administration of justice, or with the intent of influencing any judge, juror, witness, or court officer, in the discharge of his duty, pickets or parades in or near a building housing a court of the United States, or in or near a building or residence occupied or used by such judge, juror, witness, or court officer, or with such intent uses any sound-truck or similar device or resorts to any other demonstration in or near any such building or residence, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than one year, or both.
Nothing in this section shall interfere with or prevent the exercise by any court of the United States of its power to punish for contempt.
(Added Sept. 23, 1950, ch. 1024, title I, § 31(a), 64 Stat. 1018; amended Pub. L. 103–322, title XXXIII, § 330016(1)(K), Sept. 13, 1994, 108 Stat. 2147.)
Watch the video at 1:05. She says it.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.