That’s not what “globalism” means. Russia and China would better be described as “imperialist”, though I don’t believe that today’s Russia is looking to dominate the world as the Soviet Union wanted to do, nor could they. China certainly is, though.
The globalists are those who speak in lofty terms of a “new world order”, in which “nationalism” will be replaced by a global government that unites all of the worlds’s nations, somewhat akin to Star Trek’s Federation. The promise is that this will ensure peace and prosperity for all, and will eliminate the devastating wars of the past that were caused by disputes and competition between sovereign nations. Of course, the reality is that this promise is only a smokescreen for the ultimate tyrannical government that will enslave every person on Earth.
The two countries other than China that still hold the tightest to national sovereignty and self-determination are Russia and the United States, and a global government cannot be implemented until our two countries are either absorbed into the collective or are destroyed. There cannot be anywhere for the subjects of the global tyranny to escape to, which makes the United States in particular the number one target of the globalists. Russia is a target more for the fact that it simply won’t go along with the global collective, and insists upon protecting and even expanding what it deems its sovereign territory.
What is your definition of globalist?
Oh, sorry, you did.
Russia and China talk of a global government under them.
“The two countries other than China that still hold the tightest to national sovereignty and self-determination”
Sorry, but that completely ignores the facts that Vietnam, Japan, South Korea, India, Ethiopia, iran, Poland, Hungary, Ukraine etc hold to national sovereignty and self determination.
Russia wants to crush Ukrainian national sovereignty and self determination