Semimojo, Observator, Here is another Freeper giving free lessons in rationality and common sense.
And he continues.
Now, Devin, if you are saying your outlet has control of its platform and does not need to indulge any old point of view (setting aside Section 230), ok. But the moment you do so at the behest of the Government, you become an agent of said Government and the Constitutional restrictions apply. I believe “collusion” is a word that should sound familiar to you. Does Journolist ring a bell? So don’t collude, m’kay?
You have a gift for posting statements that almost sound like they make sense but don't stand up to a moment's reflection.
Businesses and individuals do untold number of things at various governments' request every day. Voluntarily and not under penalty of law.
Provided what the government requests is legal, what's the legal basis for saying the cooperating entity loses their Constitutional rights when they cooperate?