If it cannot be challenged it is not science.
The headline is a lie.
They’re not accepting ads that question the UN’s assertion of what climate change is based on their “scientific consensus”
This is pure, raw, censorship.
Climate Change (was global warming was global cooling) is not a proven science by any means and not factually based anymore than Covid “science” was.
Twitter bans anything that contradicts the phony science on climate change.
Twitter is not the scientific arbiter on what is correct or not. They have zero bona fide authority to determine this.
If they say they say they are basing it on scientists, they are admitting they are basing it on only one side of the scientific discussion and have already decided no other views will be allowed. They are destroying debate not preserving it.
We have always been at war with Oceania. Until we haven’t.
That would be the John F’n Kerry Kool-Aid Science™? Send me a private jet and an unlimited gas card, I’ll get right on that.
Ya’ll should try TruthSocial! If you signed up and haven’t been admitted yet, they just added a bazillion users overnight. It is worth the wait!!
Socialists pretty much agree on the climate change hoax. Wonder why...
Maybe twitter gets a ‘10%’, for each one. Maybe farcebook gets same, or more.
Twatter is not nor ever has been a free speech platform. And anyone who thinks it is is a blithering moron.
Twatter is not nor ever has been a free speech platform. And anyone who thinks it is is a blithering moron.
Twatter is not nor ever has been a free speech platform. And anyone who thinks it is is a blithering moron.
“What science?”
“Political science”
If you really want to know what is going on, look at the stuff you are not allowed to talk about. If you talked about the death camps in WW2 Germany, the government would deny their existence and then send you to one
It’s not contradicting “science”. Science isn’t a bunch of computer programs that output the graphs that the programmers put into them. Science starts with a hypothesis and rigorously rests it and comes to a conclusion based on the tests. Climate BS starts with the conclusion and works backward to alter the inputs and methods to support the forordained conclusion. Not science at all just complex lies.
Twitter says it will no longer allow advertisers on its site who deny the scientific consensus of their version of the not in the real world climate change
Why not? Twitter CEO - Parag Agrawal and Google CEO - Sundar Pichai. Both are foreigners from India who came here on student visas, IIRC.... The land of good and plenty and opportunity to oppress.
Musk will change all that. It’s just a matter of time..
In the Renaissance people were finally free to challenge “scientific consensus”. Topics could be debated. And so science advanced.
Oh, well. Back to the Dark Ages we go.
We no longer live in a world where truth can be found by average person. Information is freedom, truth is freedom; we are no longer living in a free country
“. . . important conversations about the climate crisis . . ..”
Uhmmm, how do you have a “CONVERSATION” if only one view is expressed? That’s a monologue.
The Lobotomy Procedure was proven science.
How did that work out?