To Julian Assange, hurting the United States was the only goal. His motives were evil and showed no discretion towards soldiers in harms way. And I’d hardly call underwear on the head a crime against humanity. But he knew with Bush in office, his leftist media cohorts would hyperventilate over it and use it to beat the drums about how terrible our soldiers were.
Assange is an evil coward, always has been.
“To Julian Assange, hurting the United States was the only goal. His motives were evil and showed no discretion towards soldiers in harms way.”
Maybe. Yet, if we weren’t actually doing anything wrong, then he would have nothing to expose us for.
“And I’d hardly call underwear on the head a crime against humanity.”
If it wasn’t wrong, then why care if he exposed it? The fact that you seem to think that this exposure hurt our troops means it must have been wrong in some way. You can’t have your cake and eat it too. Either the troops did something they should not have done, in which case the responsibility for the repercussions is theirs, or they did nothing wrong, in which case Assange couldn’t have caused us any harm by exposing it. So which is it?
You keep saying Assange exposed Underwear on the head. Stop.
The Abu Ghraib scandal broke on 28 April 2004 when photos taken by him and other soldiers at the prison were revealed on CBS News. The pictures showed naked prisoners heaped into a pyramid, forced to simulate sexual acts and adopt humiliating poses.May 16, 2018
WikiLeaks released the Collateral Murder video from the wounding of children, and killing two Reuters employees, along with the killing of about 12 other people..
https://youtu.be/HfvFpT-iypw
Oops, I accidentally deleted the name of the Abu Ghraib leaker. It was Joe Darby, a reservist serving in Iraq.