What is their definition of "mass fraud" I wonder. What is their acceptable amount of "fraud" I wonder. Is it 10 votes, 100 votes, 1000 votes? Is there basis "enough to overturn an election"? Because that's a non working premise. Is it O.K. to steal $50,000 from a bank because it isn't "enough" to bankrupt the bank?
The most important story out of 2020 was the steal from Trump. The second-most important story out of 2020, was the incredible machinations that Nanzi went to, to simultaneously attempt to overturn Iowa (IA-2), where after Rep. Miller-Meeks claimed a 6-vote victory, Democrat Rita Hart would not accept any booby prize (like Max Rose did in his NY-11 ultra-close loss, being appointed ,Special Advisor to the UnderSecretary for Defense for COVID-19", I kid you not).
While at the same time Nanzi ordered no MSM coverage, other than being the sole point person on this story, that would point out her hypocrisy allowing Rita Hart to complain about election fraud in Iowa, while her MSM was busy libeling Trump for making identical accusations in (ahem) less-GOP ghettos than Iowa.
‘It’s Only Six Votes’: Pelosi Excuses Democrats From Launching Probe to Possibly Unseat GOP MemberNobody made hay of this. NOBODY. As all this was going down in 2021, Rudy missed an oppo on Steponallofus -- whose mantra "only a little fraud" consistently went unanswered -- to ram Rita Hart's assertion of electoral fraud in, of all places, IOWA, right down George's goddamn gullet. Trump mentioned it once, so at least Stephen Miller put it on the teleprompter. Proof of how much Rush is missed, he died almost exactly a month before this story came together, and he would have crushed the Democrats with their game-playing in IA-2.
Epoch Times | March 15, 2021 | JACK PHILLIPS"House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) on Sunday excused Democrats who launched an investigation into possibly unseating an elected GOP House representative, explaining that the margin of victory was extremely slim.
“It was six votes,” Pelosi told ABC News on Sunday, noting the number of votes by which Rep. Mariannette Miller-Meeks (R-Iowa) defeated her Democratic opponent, Rita Hart.
Miller-Meeks was ultimately seated in Congress after votes were counted, recounted, and certified by the state. Several days ago, the House Administration Committee started a process that could lead to Miller-Meeks being unseated.
“It was six votes, and our candidate Rita Hart, the Democratic candidate asked for this process to begin,” Pelosi told ABC. “What the committee did, the House Administration Committee, was very narrow to take the process to the next step and see where it goes from there. An election of six votes out of 400,000 votes cast. This is not unique. This has happened, maybe even when you were in the Capitol before when races had been close one side or the others saying, let’s take it to the House.”
She said that former Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia “agreed that the House has the authority to seat members,” meaning that “we can count the votes.”
Several days prior to her interview, Pelosi told reporters in a press conference that overturning the election in favor of Hart is a “hypothetical” situation but later said it’s possible.
“Well, I respect the work of the committee,” the California Democrat said on March 12. “I did see, as you saw in the press, what they decided to—and they were following my, as I read it, the requirements of the law as to how you go forward. And how you go forward is the path you’re on and we’ll see where that takes us. But there could be a scenario to that extent. Yes.”
Pelosi, with her Sunday comment, appeared to be echoing a statement sent out by Rep. Zoe Lofgren (D-Calif.), the chair of the House Administration Committee, to her members saying that “the margin separating the two candidates was only six votes out of almost 400,000 cast: less than 1/6 of 1 percent. That’s six votes—not 6,000; not 600; not 60 or even 16—just six fewer votes than we have members of this committee.”