There always those silly little things called counted votes without any actual voter. Like in Delco, PA where the Board of elections post the 2020 election results for president and there are 27K more mail in votes than there were actual mail in voters according tot h e SURE system that keeps track of the voters in the state. Statewide about 400K more according to the audit that Frank Ryan did. Then little things like Corman and company ignoring the facts and the easy play to show the fraud and simple file a subpoena that will go no where. Thos type of things.
You know, the Left keeps this bullshit argument of “baseless lies”.
They are not “baseless”. The Democrats FOR YEARS cheated the elections. EVERYONE knows this. Therefore, such allegations ARE NOT BASELESS as the Democrats did so for years.
The problem is proving it now.
I could almost agree with the idea that it’s better to accept the last election and win the next one....
EXCEPT I can’t forget Hillary with that sickening smug false smile saying “Come on, he knows he’s not legitimate he knows something went on....”
Or the funeral scene non concession speech.
Or that Stacey Abrams is really governor.
And didn’t Biden have a team of 6000 lawyers in place to challenge the election?
Oh and Hillary telling Biden before the election ... Don’t you concede no matter what the result is on election day, we’ll reverse our and you’ll win.
Democrats can go straight to hell.
These Fkrs criminally and treasonously(sic) cheated and stole the election and disenfranchised nearly 90 million of us.
The election can’t be overturned but, maybe the next two election cycles give us an opportunity to make a point....and defeat them
Overturn the 2020 results in Trump's favor and you immediately end any chance for a 2024 run.
Haberman thinks that covering The Steal "lie" will make people think that The Steal is a lie.
I think it will do the opposite. Thanks for the coverage, Maggie. Cover it more.
What is their definition of "mass fraud" I wonder. What is their acceptable amount of "fraud" I wonder. Is it 10 votes, 100 votes, 1000 votes? Is there basis "enough to overturn an election"? Because that's a non working premise. Is it O.K. to steal $50,000 from a bank because it isn't "enough" to bankrupt the bank?
The NYT’s version of sticking their fingers in their ears and saying “LA LA LA LA LA LA LA LA LA...”
“based on his lie”
“based on a set of bogus legal theories”
” seek to prove baseless claims”
“fueling a false narrative”
“keeping alive the same combustible stew of conspiracy theory and misinformation”
The gaslighting never ends.
Source: New York Times via Yahoo.
Need I say anything????
Voting machines that use proprietary software should be illegal.
as long as you belong to the Media-Dem Party you can claim an election was stolen as long as you want without a shred of evidence. In the case of the 2020 election, there is literally tons of evidence, including a Time magazine article boasting about how the election was stolen thru illegal voting changes, media manipulation, and social media censorship.
This hilarious article is funny because Old Haggly Haberman had to rehabilitate it and sign the byline after 2 noodniks did the beat work and came up with the same old slander.
81 million people voted for the Easter Bunny to run the show. It can’t be undone.
Correctly labeled “Editorial” on FR but not on Yahoo.
They weren’t bogus legal theories. If they had been, congress would not be trying to change those laws, to “fix” the “problems”.
Logic tells you that there must be a legal way to fix a fraudulent election.