Musk owns only 20% of Tesla, and sill totally controls the company.
And Musk is not “everyone else”. He owns 9.2% of the company Twitter, is the richest man by far on the planet, the world's greatest entrepreneur and has the wherewithal to take over Twitter whenever he wants. He can and will strike back if necessarily.
I get that, but from a simply practical, functional perspective, is he not subject to censorship in this platform? Are there not elements holding a different stake who see nothing to loose in silencing Musk?