Is it a violation of WSJ copyright to archive the article and post links to it?
“Is it a violation of WSJ copyright to archive the article and post links to it?”
hell if i know ... if it was, the copyright violator would be archive.is ... clearly archive.is has a subscription to wsj, nyt and multiple other paywalled outfits that allow them to archive and provide links for ... and there’s no law (yet) in the U.S. to referencing links to places
archive.is has been doing this for years, and yet their subscriptions have not been terminated ... i suspect that what’s going on is that this is the way that paywalled sites have chosen to allow “leaking”, because a 100% paywalled site that is so sealed off and isolated from the internet might as well not even BE on the internet ...