I understand that you had an issue with someone from your past and his spoiled son.
***Yes, and now millions of people look at that guy and basically would nod in agreement at my assessment of his character and even comments about his testosterone levels.
That you assume that these people were using performance enhancing drugs,
***That is no assumption when it comes to Barry Bonds.
that the P.E. drug was testosterone and that it caused these issues.
***That is not an assumption. It is an observATION. And it’s an observation that many in the industry have made themselves & backed it up with plenty of data.
From those assumptions
***OBSERVATIONS.
you generalized
***I did NOT. I proffered an example. One that millions of people are aware of and I have my own unique perspective on. One that you DON’T have, I might add. I didn’t see YOU on that street when I was growin’ up.
that natural levels of testosterone are responsible for people being @$$#0/es.
***I didn’t say that. You’re propping up a straw argument here, a classic fallacy. It’s time for me to start steering you, Brooklyn Assitude, towards my second sentence in my original comment on this thread.
Maybe in some cases,
***Well, now, by your own straw argument you are generalizing YOURSELF. And making assumptions. It’s obvious you’re simply arguing against your own position so read my 2nd sentence and buzz off, testyboy.
but lots of people are aholes for reasons that have nothing to do with testosterone.
***Which would be outside the subject of this entire thread, a red herring, yet another straw argument. You can’t seem to stay away from those classic fallacies.
People who cannot respond to a legitimate question without becoming obnoxious, irrational, or make a valid argument.
***Yeah, YOU.
Someone like you.
***Hey, Assitude boy: You’re the one who even signed up with an attitude as a LOGIN NAME. You are the one who uses classic fallacies. You’re the obnoxious, irrational, invalid one here. That makes you the @$$#0/e in this interchange, so I’m referring you back to my 2nd sentence of my original comment and you can just shove off.
In summary, a rich boy made Kevmo his b*tch,
***Wow. You went off into the weeds real fast, Assitude boy.
so Kevmo hates testosterone.
***Straw argument. Basic jerkwad tone. Not worth responding to any more, but thanks for the entertainment value.
That why he doesn’t have any.
***Methinks the lady doth protest too much.
I’m truly sorry that the rich son of a “testosterone-laden father” bullied you so badly that you now have a hatred of testosterone. It’s so bad that you can’t help but embarrass yourself at the mere mention of the stuff. I hope you will come to realize that masculinity is a good thing and you will reconsider having yourself castrated if it’s not already too late. Best Wishes.