Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: BusterDog

My guess is that the U.S. told them to allow all ships to pass. Maintaining open passage on the high seas has been one of the foundational principles of U.S. foreign policy for decades. It’s the reason why the U.S. found itself in the unusual position of siding with Egypt and the Soviet Union against Great Britain, France and Israel during the Suez Canal crisis in the 1950s.


38 posted on 02/26/2022 6:35:40 AM PST by Alberta's Child ("Mr. Potato Head ... Mr. Potato Head! Back doors are not secrets.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]


To: Alberta's Child

The Bosporus and Dardanelles are not exactly the high seas and are quite narrow. In most circumstances they would be considered a part of the country. But with Ottoman Empire on losing side in World War 1 and given the strategic and commercial importance the straights they were viewed differently and subjected to international treaties

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Montreux_Convention_Regarding_the_Regime_of_the_Straits


99 posted on 02/26/2022 7:57:05 AM PST by grumpygresh (Civil disobedience by non-compliance; jury and state nullification. )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies ]

To: Alberta's Child

“It’s the reason why the U.S. found itself in the unusual position of siding with Egypt and the Soviet Union against Great Britain, France and Israel during the Suez Canal crisis in the 1950s.”

Which, apropos of nothing at all, just happened to coincide with the Hungarian uprising against the Soviet Union and its Hungarian lackeys, and the subsequent invasion by the Soviets.


141 posted on 02/26/2022 8:50:15 AM PST by Flash Bazbeaux
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson