Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

CNN's Jake Tapper calls Biden's rejection of Army’s after-action report on Afghanistan 'insulting'
Fox news ^ | 02/13/2022 | Lindsay Kornick

Posted on 02/13/2022 1:03:34 PM PST by ChicagoConservative27

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-28 last
To: ChicagoConservative27

The Dems have not lost Jake Tapper. Making one comment somewhat negative against Biden in the preview of Biden’s pre-Super Bowl interview is probably just to get people to tune in and watch the full interview. When millions of people watch the actual pre-Super Bowl interview, I will be shocked if Jake Tapper includes anything except the most obsequious praise for Biden.


21 posted on 02/13/2022 4:59:39 PM PST by Freee-dame
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: freespirit2012; All

I guess the 60 court cases, many judged by Trump appointees that all ruled there was no significant vote tampering probably seemed like reality to Biden.


22 posted on 02/14/2022 2:01:38 AM PST by gleeaikin (,Question authority!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: TonyM

Harris is unfit to hold the office, so it’s important she is
replaced. The problem is, we’re going to get someone they
Left really wants that could never be elected. Watch out
then!

As for Jordan, I don’t know him well. He could be just the
right guy if his head is glued on straight.

As for president, lets let him deal with the power in the
Senate before we get too greedy. “:^)


23 posted on 02/14/2022 10:39:37 AM PST by DoughtyOne (I pledge allegiance to the flag of the U S of A, and to the REPUBLIC for which it stands.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: gleeaikin

I’m not certain Trump’s team was up to snuff in this effort.

You can bring up stupid stuff, while other real problems
don’t get presented or challenged. From what I’ve seen,
and I’ll admit I haven’t tuned in to every case, it seemed
the real problems were not addressed.

The best way to defeat an effort, is to appoint someone who
has no clue what needs to be done.

That’s what I think we are seeing in those 60 cases.

Others more in tune, may see it differently. Would welcome
them chiming in.


24 posted on 02/14/2022 10:43:07 AM PST by DoughtyOne (I pledge allegiance to the flag of the U S of A, and to the REPUBLIC for which it stands.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Tallguy

He is destroying the Republic, but his fellow travelers didn’t
realize the populace would see it and object.

To destroy the Republic, you have to do a lot of things that
are going to impact your political base negatively. Look out
then. They won’t be happy.


25 posted on 02/14/2022 10:44:45 AM PST by DoughtyOne (I pledge allegiance to the flag of the U S of A, and to the REPUBLIC for which it stands.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: DoughtyOne

I presume Trump had some lawyers managing these court cases, and a lot running more or less in the same short period. Who were the key lawyers setting up the strategy, and how were the many other lawyers needed to respond to these events being trained and briefed?


26 posted on 02/14/2022 5:49:20 PM PST by gleeaikin (,Question authority!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: gleeaikin

Good questions. I don’t have the answers.

I don’t know the dynamics of what Trump knew and what they
were looking for. I’m not sure if he put someone like Rudy
in charge, and everyone answered to him, him and others, or
to Trump also.

We all saw those ballots seemingly put through the counter
three times. We knew that some state entities other than
the approved legislative method were used to change voting
procedures. That’s supposedly illegal. We don’t know what
happened to the precinct where they told Conservative poll
watchers they were closing down until morning, then went
on counting and wouldn’t let those Conservatives back in.
There are reports of family members being angry about their
relatives having submitted votes, when they had Alzheimers.
I’ve seen no explanation for Basement Joe being more
appealing that Obama or Clinton. They got 65 million votes
the prior times, and Joe got 81 million. There’s also the
issue of some ballots not being the legal ones, because
they weren’t folded like the officials ones were. Why did
they cover windows so nobody could see in some precincts?

How much of this was checked out?

In some of the precincts that we saw video of, it almost
looked like a BLM crew running the counting process.

There are a lot of questions. I’m probably leaving out a number of them.

We know that the Democrats always accuse us of what they
are doing. Right now they are trying to say the 2022
elections are in danger of being corrupted and stolen.

Of course McConnell and others are trying to make it look
like Trump wanted to steel the election. And never mind
that the Democrats probably did.


27 posted on 02/15/2022 2:38:03 PM PST by DoughtyOne (I pledge allegiance to the flag of the U S of A, and to the REPUBLIC for which it stands.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: ChicagoConservative27

Poll: Majority of veterans say U.S. did not leave Afghanistan Honorably

https://static1.squarespace.com/static/5f91012fcf265e0faa9bbebc/t/618c4fc6e7f3e177acae2961/1636585414614/After+Kabul+%28More+in+Common%29_Final.pdf


28 posted on 02/22/2022 2:12:44 PM PST by KeyLargo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-28 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson