Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Vermont Lt

The only “net worth” my mortgage bank cared about was my liquid assets — checking and savings accounts, and investment funds outside retirement accounts.


24 posted on 01/19/2022 6:56:40 AM PST by Alberta's Child ("All lies and jest; still, a man hears what he wants to hear and disregards the rest.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies ]


To: Alberta's Child

And I am sure you had to provide statements.

If you said you had a million in assets...and the bank discovered that during the process, my guess is the bank would not be happy.

Is it a “crime.” Only if they can prove fraud. It would be a cause for withdrawing any offer or foreclosing on an existing loan.

The issue here is that I think I read they were using the “inflated valuations” to get some sort of tax relief. I am not sure how that works—but fraud on a state or fed document is a bad thing.

But, as I wrote before, the three people in question might have their signatures on the docs, but I doubt very much they knew the valuations, instructed anyone to lie, or files an obviously false document.

But we all know that if you are not 100% accurate on government documents, they can nail you to the wall.


25 posted on 01/19/2022 7:01:36 AM PST by Vermont Lt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies ]

To: Alberta's Child
The only “net worth” my mortgage bank cared about was my liquid assets — checking and savings accounts, and investment funds outside retirement accounts.

Some banks didn't even care about that prior to the 2008 GFC. I am old enough to remember NINJA loans..

27 posted on 01/19/2022 7:22:52 AM PST by EVO X ( )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson