Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Mr Rogers

Negligence and recklessness also qualifies one for a criminal act, not just intent. “Should have reasonably known better” is a qualifier.


38 posted on 12/24/2021 12:09:31 PM PST by Spktyr (Overwhelmingly superior firepower and the willingness to use it is the only proven peace solution.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies ]


To: Spktyr

“Negligence and recklessness also qualifies one for a criminal act, not just intent.”

Not really. Watch the video. Particularly under Minnesota law, terms like negligence and recklessness are defined. If you shoot a gun into the air and someone dies, you are responsible because anyone can foresee doing what you KNOW you are doing could kill an innocent person.

Doing something by mistake is NOT “criminal” negligence. It may be negligence with liability under civil law, but it is not CRIMINAL negligence. Folks keep failing to make a distinction between something that can be punished with something that is a crime. Those are different things.


89 posted on 12/24/2021 4:52:45 PM PST by Mr Rogers (We're a nation of feelings, not thoughts.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson