That page requires registration to look at the data. Got one without the block so we can actually look at the data?
From what I could see, I noted that the data is always presented as deaths per 100K. They don't like to give the actual numbers. Why? Because it makes it clear that many people are dying despite getting the jab...and that the lines on the graph are converging as efficacy of the jab wears off. So even assuming your best-case scenario is true, what we're left with is this:
The jab grants life-time immunity: FAIL
The jab prevents covid: FAIL
The jab prevents transmission of covid: FAIL
The jab prevents you from getting hospitalized if you get covid: FAIL
The jab prevents you from dying if you get covid: FAIL
The jab makes it less likely you'll be hospitalized if you get covid: Partial success
The jab makes it less likely that you'll die if you get covid: Partial success
The jab has a very poor adverse reaction history: TRUE
You will need to get regular boosters to top-up protection every 4-6 months for the rest of your life: TRUE.
No research has been done to gauge the effect of endless boosters every 4-6 months over a long period of time: TRUE.
If this is what success looks like, I'd hate to see failure.
“The jab makes it less likely you’ll be hospitalized if you get covid: Partial success
The jab makes it less likely that you’ll die if you get covid: Partial success”
I’m not ready to give them this. Their retreat through the stages you laid out (they all started out as gold standard true for whatever reason) has been beaten back with data that has ever-so-reluctantly leaked out. Now we give them partials on these two... simply because we don’t have enough data to give them a fail.
As a society, we’re doing this backwards in my opinion. Every point you laid out should have started out FALSE. Then, as the data rolls in, we could start calling them TRUE.