“The three men, who are white,”
wow, the white liberal guilt ass clowns from the MSM make sure to type that in. But if 100 ghetto animals attack and rob a mall, they never mention the color..
This is the one where an alleged “Jogger” charged a man holding a firearm...Seems a bit odd.
Two big verdicts in a week and both of them were correct IMO. Imperfect country as it is we have a lot to be thankful for this thanksgiving. It can always be worse.
I wonder...what would be if the races were all reversed...?
Of course, I would hope that the same verdict would occure.
We have to be confident in the system...right?
🤙👍🏾🤨😇
Felony murder?
That’s redundant.
What degree?
To understand what really happened, I ask persons willing to devote more than a minute or so to what was a matter of life or death to view my posts in another thread starting with post 51 and the plain, uncommented video that follows.
I think the Arbery guy is guilty of burglarizing that house. That said, these fellas were fools for chasing him down the road. Was this self defense? Maybe, both sides were defending themselves. Problem is, these guys were totally wrong setting up a confrontation with Arbery. Just call the cops guys. I know they suck sometimes, but this is what you get trying to play cop. Hell. even the cops get convicted for stuff like this.
If the house being burgled was not their own home, they just appeared to be guys out to take the law in their own hands. It was immensely stupid on their part.
I am sure these guys wish they had never did what they did, but it it no surprise that they will pay for their foolishness.
I’m getting mighty sick of
white vs. Black
nonsense.
Imagine if it were the other way round.
They should have just let him take the gun from them. He wanted it awfully bad. We can all be positively sure he would have kindly told them to just “go on home, and I will drop your gun off tomorrow when you have all cooled down”. They had absolutely nothing to fear with letting him have the gun. Simple. Simple. Simple.
It looks like this case was determined by the illegal detainment. Were it not for that, it would have been pretty solid self defense case.
They simply were not within their legal rights to “hold him for the police” as they did not witness a crime, other than trespassing.
This does seem like a solid precedent to me that anyone who illegally detains anyone, (say a protester blocking a road preventing someone for moving), cannot claim self defense if said detained person uses lethal force, (attempting to run them over), in trying to escape their detainment.
Am I wrong?
From what I understand, one guy didn’t even follow the guy down the street, the son did not use a weapon if he had one. I can see the Father being guilty of murder, but the other two it seems to me should be a lesser charge or conviction.