Fauci Finally Admits Vaccines Don’t Protect Against Serious Covid or Death

American Thinker ^ | 11/19/2021 | Vasko Kohlmayer

[SeekAndFind]

Last week Dr. Anthony Fauci made perhaps the most damning confession in the Covid vaccine saga. So far-reaching are the implications of his statement that the interview in which he made it may well prove a turning point in the fight against the vaccine fraud that is being perpetrated on the peoples of the world.

In a November 12 podcast session with the New York Times, Fauci was forced to admit the fact that the vaccines do not reliably protect their recipients from serious Covid or death.

Called upon to explain the data coming from Israel – a country with one of the highest vaccination rates in the world – Fauci said the following:

“They are seeing a waning of immunity not only against infection but against hospitalization and to some extent death, which is starting to now involve all age groups. It isn’t just the elderly” [emphasis added].

In other words, the vaccines’ protective efficacy wanes not only in regard to the threat of infection, but also in regard to severe Covid and death. Speaking about the effectiveness of the vaccines in countries with high vaccination rates, Fauci admitted:

“It’s waning to the point that you’re seeing more and more people getting breakthrough infections, and more and more of those people who are getting breakthrough infections are winding up in the hospital.”

Even though Fauci tries to palliate the hard impact of his answer in soft language, the harsh truth behind his words is painfully evident.

Fauci’s words amount to the admission that the vaccinated are getting infected and more and more of them are ending up in hospital where they keep succumbing to Covid at increasing rates.

[Dutch Boy]

They are going to have to start putting heroin in the boosters to get people addicted or they will get tired of getting them after Booster shot #25.

[wrench]

Where are the peer reviewed studies on this? No trials on the elderly or children, only young and healthy volunteers, and they still lied about how many DIED from the jab.

All we have are the CLAIMS from the manufacturer and the (very political) CDC.

[odawg]

“OK, both pro and anti-vaxxers, can we at least agree on this:”

No, because you slurred opposition to the covid vaccine by using the smear “anti-vaxxer.”

Most of us, the overwhelming majority of us, are opposed to the covid vaccine because it is inherently dangerous, and not because it is a vaccine.

Also, according to the experts not in employ of the government or drug companies, a cost benefit analysis says the vaccine is more dangerous for more people than the virus.

[gitmo]

Now this is a scary story. Fauci told the truth? What the heck is going on? There is a rupture in the space time continuum.

[353FMG]

Incomprehensible that he still has a job and is not in jail for lying to Congress.

[BereanBrain]

I don’t agree they provide some degree of protection.
Neither do masks, which we were told the same thing.
If masks work, why vaccines?
If vaccines don’t keep you from getting covid, or from the bad effects of covid, why take the risk of repeated vaccinations?

Why not take care of your health, eat right, build your natural immunity?
I have been practicing the above, and have not had 1) the Flue or 2) a cold for over 10 years. On top of that, I never contracted covid, even though neighbors on both sides of me did.

Both sets of neighbors are overweight, eat junk, don’t take supplements, don’t get enough sunlight, etc.

But hey, live like hell and take a pill (or vaccine) that’s been the story for 50 years, with rising cancer rates, etc.

in 1900 one in 20 died of cancer, now it’s approaching 1 in 3.

makes Covid look tame, no?

[alloysteel]

So what does the vaccine DO?

Seems an awful lot of money and effort has been put into trying to “prove” its efficacy. And the needle still has not moved very far from its original position.

Change the nutritional supplementation just a little bit, with some source of zinc ion available in a form readily absorbed into the blood stream, and a Zn++ ionophore that opens up the sites on the coronavirus particle, effectively stopping the coronavirus from replicating. Suitable ionophores include quercetin, hydroxychloroquine, bromelain, Vitamin C, and Vitamin D3.

The most important aspect of this treatment is that it has to be available very early in the course of the COVID-19 Wuhan virus treatment. Giving too little, or delaying the commencement of treatment leads to a distinct decline of the efficacy of the treatment.

[353FMG]

>>Impeach 46.<<

Would require an act of God and/or a CW. Americans are not aware how Biden has caused a very perilous situation of the country bordering a collapse of society.
Or perhaps they plainly don’t care.

[DannyTN]

I agree with you.

But good luck getting everyone to agree.

The article’s title makes it sounds like it doesn’t provide any protection which is very very misleading.

[SeekAndFind]

Post #23 objects to the use of the term: anti-vaxxer and explains why he disagrees.

[SeekAndFind]

RE: So what does the vaccine DO?

It gives TEMPORARY protection and a better chance of not being severely ill, hospitalized and dying than not being vaccinated. That’s all it does.

Whether it prevents infection and transmission better than those unvaccinated, I still don’t know.

NOTE: Infection does not necessarily mean illness.

[DannyTN]

yeah, pretty soon someone will show up to object to the vaccine being called a vaccine.

[Grampa Dave]

It does not matter, who you are, or how smart you are, or what title you have, or how many of you, there are, and certainly not how many papers you have published!

If your prediction is wrong, then your hypothesis was/is wrong!

Period!

Richard Feynman

[Belteshazzar]

Maybe. But it will never happen if people say nothing. So, I choose to say something.

Impeach 46.

[aMorePerfectUnion]

--> The current vaccines DO provide some degree of protection ( at least your chances of being hospitalized and dying are markedly decreased ) against Covid

No.

Human population starts with +80% with full or partial immunity to covid.

lf someone is exposed to covid who is partially immune, their immunity is completed. This is excellent. They are typically asymptomatic or extremely mild symptoms.

For anyone else, their survival rate is from +99.5% to as high as 99.995% for children. These are headline numbers. The actual numbers are higher.

Out of the .005% to1.5% depending on age and comorbidities, the vaxx ->may<- protect them or it may not. They can still get serious covid, be hospitalized, spread covid, die of covid.

I am in the middle of amish country, and very early on, they decided they could not follow their way of life and lock down. Further, they do not like hospitals, vaccines (generally), can't social distance, etc.

They decided to ignore it all.

Covid went through their population within a couple months. No testing during that time. Since they were not going to get a treatment it had not point, so people carried on with their lives.

Here's my point: their numbers were no different than any other population that did the other stuff. And they achieved herd immunity while everyone else was locked down, isolated, jabbed, etc.

Same results - and they includes vastly undercounting vaxx severe reactions and deaths from various causes after vaxxes.

So how large an impact can we attribute to the vaxx?? Little.

I hasten to add that the Amish avoided 100% of the vaxx side effects.

The Amish achieved BROAD immunity and will have significant protection from the next variants.

The jury is out on whether or what kind of immunity a vaxxed person gets, if they go on to get covid.

The jury is out on any long term hazards of the spike mRNA vaxx. For all we know, it makes people susceptible to other viruses or cancer, etc. No one knows.

I know from personally talking to Amish that this information is true. I also go to a doctor that has half his practice made of Amish patients. I talked to him and he verified this.

[T.B. Yoits]

yeah, pretty soon someone will show up to object to the vaccine being called a vaccine.

The CDC changed their definition of a vaccine in order to fit the Jim Jones Jab because the Jim Jones Jab is NOT a vaccine.

[P-Marlowe]

I would not agree. All the statistics have been manipulated. How can you know what is true?

[DannyTN]

Yep post 36.

[Magnum44]

[mewzilla]

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-10220205/Hero-NHS-surgeon-dies-Covid-spending-months-away-family.html

Check out the third bullet point at the top of the article.

His widow didn’t think he’d had another booster right before he died?!

Okaaaaaay....