Posted on 11/18/2021 5:34:39 AM PST by Pilgrim's Progress
Links will be provided at they become available.
Hoping to see this thing wrap up soon with a favorable verdict for our nation's hero - Kyle Rittenhouse and some legal jeopardy for ADA Binger and his buddy Krause (aka Fatlock).
What do you want to bet that the doxxing has already occurred? MSNBC very likely already has the home addresses of the jurors.
Reporters on Court TV are usually leftists.
What you say may be true, but it is not in this case. That reporter was covering for bad behavior.
https://abcnews.go.com/US/wireStory/explainer-charges-kyle-rittenhouse-face-81177832
EXPLAINER: What charges does Kyle Rittenhouse face?
Kyle Rittenhouse faces multiple charges for shooting three men, killing two, during a protest against police brutality in Kenosha, Wisconsin, in August 2020
By TODD RICHMOND Associated Press November 15, 2021, 10:01 PM • 5 min read
4:21 Closing arguments begin in Kyle Rittenhouse trial
Hundreds of National Guard members are on standby in Kenosha, Wisconsin, as Rittenh...Read More The Associated Press
MADISON, Wis. -- Kyle Rittenhouse shot three men, killing two of them and wounding the third, during a protest against police brutality in Kenosha, Wisconsin, last year. Rittenhouse has argued that he fired in self-defense after the men attacked him. Here's a look at the charges that prosecutors carried into court, as well as lesser charges that the judge put before the jury in final instructions.
COUNT 1: FIRST-DEGREE RECKLESS HOMICIDE, USE OF A DANGEROUS WEAPON
This felony charge is connected to the death of Joseph Rosenbaum, the first man Rittenhouse shot. Bystander video shows Rosenbaum chasing Rittenhouse through a parking lot and throwing a plastic bag at him. Rittenhouse flees behind a car and Rosenbaum follows. Video introduced at trial showed Rittenhouse wheeling around and firing as Rosenbaum chased him. Richie McGinniss, a reporter who was trailing Rittenhouse, testified that Rosenbaum lunged for Rittenhouse's gun.
Reckless homicide differs from intentional homicide in that prosecutors aren't alleging Rittenhouse intended to murder Rosenbaum. Instead, they're alleging Rittenhouse caused Rosenbaum's death in circumstances showing an utter disregard for human life.
The charge is punishable by up to 60 years in prison. The dangerous weapon modifier carries an additional five years.
COUNT 2: FIRST-DEGREE RECKLESSLY ENDANGERING SAFETY, USE OF A DANGEROUS WEAPON
This felony charge is connected to the Rosenbaum shooting. McGinniss told investigators he was in the line of fire when Rittenhouse shot Rosenbaum. The charge is punishable by 12 1/2 years in prison. The weapons modifier carries an additional five years.
COUNT 3: FIRST-DEGREE RECKLESSLY ENDANGERING SAFETY, USE OF A DANGEROUS WEAPON
Video shows an unknown man leaping at Rittenhouse and trying to kick him seconds before Anthony Huber moves his skateboard toward him. Rittenhouse appears to fire two rounds at the man but apparently misses as the man runs away.
This charge is a felony punishable by 12 1/2 years in prison. The weapons modifier again would add up to five more years.
COUNT 4: FIRST-DEGREE INTENTIONAL HOMICIDE, USE OF A DANGEROUS WEAPON
This charge is in Huber's death. Video shows Rittenhouse running down the street after shooting Rosenbaum when he falls to the street. Huber leaps at him and swings a skateboard at his head and neck and tries to grab Rittenhouse's gun before Rittenhouse fires. The criminal complaint alleges Rittenhouse aimed the weapon at Huber.
Intentional homicide means just that — a person killed someone and meant to do it. The count carries a mandatory life sentence. The weapons modifier would add up to five years.
The jury also was given the option of second-degree intentional homicide and first-degree reckless homicide in Huber's death.
Second-degree intentional homicide is punishable by up to 60 years in prison.
The first-degree reckless homicide charge sought in Huber's death matches an original charge in Rosenbaum's death — it would require jurors to decide that Rittenhouse caused Huber's death with an utter disregard for human life — and is punishable by up to 60 years in prison.
COUNT 5: ATTEMPTED FIRST-DEGREE INTENTIONAL HOMICIDE, USE OF A DANGEROUS WEAPON
This is the charge for Rittenhouse shooting Gaige Grosskreutz in the arm seconds after he shot Huber, and as Grosskreutz came toward him holding a pistol. Grosskreutz survived. Video shows Rittenhouse pointing his gun at Grosskreutz and firing a single round.
The charge carries a maximum sentence of 60 years. The weapons modifier would add up to five more years.
The jury has also been given the option of considering second-degree attempted intentional homicide and first-degree reckless endangerment charges.
The possible punishment for attempted second-degree intentional homicide is 30 years. Attempted first-degree reckless homicide is punishable by up to 12 1/2 years.
COUNT 6: POSSESSION OF A DANGEROUS WEAPON BY A PERSON UNDER 18
The judge dismissed this charge on Monday.
Rittenhouse was armed with an AR-style semi-automatic rifle. He was 17 years old on the night of the shootings. Wisconsin law prohibits minors from possessing firearms except for hunting or when supervised by an adult in target practice or instruction in the proper use of a dangerous weapon. Rittenhouse’s attorneys argued that another subsection of the law, regarding short-barreled rifles, provided grounds for dismissing the charge.
Prosecutors argued the defense was misreading the statute, and Schroeder had earlier twice declined to dismiss the charge. But the judge also had said the statute was confusing. After prosecutors conceded that the rifle was not short-barreled, Schroeder dismissed the charge.
COUNT 7: FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH AN EMERGENCY ORDER FROM STATE OR LOCAL GOVERNMENT
Rittenhouse was charged with being out on the streets after an 8 p.m. curfew imposed by the city, a minor offense that carries a fine of up to $200. The judge dismissed this charge during the trial, saying the prosecution didn't offer enough evidence to prove it.
———
This version has been updated to delete a lesser charge in Count 2 to be offered to jurors. The previous version incorrectly said the judge would offer the jury the option of convicting Rittenhouse of second-degree recklessly endangering safety for firing his weapon near Richie McGinniss. The jury will consider only a first-degree version of that charge.
———
Not taking that bet.
PANTIFA and BLM likely already have the firebombs in crates ready to go.
The judge declaring a mistrial and taking the hate on himself would probably save 12 families’ lives.
Judges have protections and connections that the average juror does not.
and you can BET this NBC trash was going to hand off the jury information to them.
Absolutely.
Free of charge.
With pictures, too!
Mirror Universe Captain Kirk must’ve flicked the switch on his wall and...POOF!
https://m.facebook.com/AAJASanDiego/photos/a.163598596988467/1478881198793527/?type=3
She worked with a news investigative team.
So why is she a glorified guest wrangler?
Or is she...
MSNBC very likely already has the home addresses of the jurors
Xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Home addresses....plus phone #s, email addresses, workplace addresses, bank acct #s, ID etc. of ALL family members, close friends....
We ain’t playin’ with Boy Scouts here. This is a powerful, well-funded information gathering organization on an ideological mission.
“Jesus....even being convicted on ONE charge could put this kid away for 60 yrs......”
If they put this kid away for one day, I would not care if China were to nuke or invade Wisconsin.
So she doesn’t like it when her name/info are made public?
Very believable.
Everything is about the message and the theater they can peddle to the somnambulant public.
Justice? Law? Logic?
Screw that. Give them a Narrative they can use.
MSNBC very likely already has the home addresses of the jurors
Xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Home addresses....plus phone #s, email addresses, workplace addresses, bank acct #s, ID etc. of ALL family members, close friends....
We ain’t playin’ with Boy Scouts here. This is a powerful, well-funded information gathering organization on an ideological mission.
/
/
you got that right
No it doesn’t. It’s a misdemeanor.
NBC—even worse.
It is their sacred duty to delve deeply into the story so that they can best serve the American people.
NBCSanDiego likely allows her to work the National Desk as a cat wrangler, ie, she is likely directing the NBC/MSNBC stringer in Kenosha.
You can make nearly as much money as on-air talent (which it appears she may have even tried early in her young-but-now-mostly-over career) if you are willing to surrender your off-time as a cat wrangler.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.