Could have given a better answer. There is no practical reason to make the comparison, although if he wanted to be fully transparent, would be good to show the original raw unmodified frames used to produce the final.
The whole point of making the modes is to "clarify" (not necessarily faithfully, just clear to the eye) a complex set of images.
I've never heard of frame averaging being used on a moving picture, usually done on a still to make it super sharp.
I missed the concluding remarks, but heard the judge tell the jury to have a nice weekend.
They showed the two stills of the picture in question and it was so blurry I couldn’t see any detail at all - so I question its value. Perhaps the state wants to just plant a seed of doubt into the jurors minds, but overall it seems silly.
The judge said all evidence has been introduced and told the jury they can go home for the weekend.
What happened to the two rebuttal witnesses that the DA said would be used to rebut Kyle’s assertion (1) that he received a bullet proof vest from the police and (2) that he was enrolled at an Arizona college.
I guess there’s all kinds of ways to skin a cat but it seems prudent to compare your finished product to the original to confirm there’s no surprises of unintentional alterations.
Him freely admitting this was another blow to a prosecution that’s been on their heels the entire time. These guys would probably ask OJ to try on the gloves again tomorrow.