Mr Video expert testifies he didn’t compare his enlargement to original.
Oh man.....
And he spent 20 hours doctoring it
Could have given a better answer. There is no practical reason to make the comparison, although if he wanted to be fully transparent, would be good to show the original raw unmodified frames used to produce the final.
The whole point of making the modes is to "clarify" (not necessarily faithfully, just clear to the eye) a complex set of images.
I've never heard of frame averaging being used on a moving picture, usually done on a still to make it super sharp.
I missed the concluding remarks, but heard the judge tell the jury to have a nice weekend.