Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: srmanuel
A lot of the focus here has been on the capacity of the Panama Canal and the toll for a container ship to make a transit through the canal. What is being overlooked here is that the biggest constraint for secondary ports like Jacksonville is usually the landside infrastructure and/or the channel limitations.

The Port of Jacksonville currently has a posted channel depth of 40 feet. I’m not sure if that’s the minimum depth at low tide or the maximum depth at high tide, but it either case it’s not deep enough to handle the Post-Panamax or “New Panamax” vessels used by the major ocean carriers for their trans-Pacific service. These vessels couldn’t make port calls at Jacksonville even if the Panama Canal was 10 miles wide and the toll was $0.

52 posted on 10/21/2021 1:45:24 PM PDT by Alberta's Child ("All lies and jest, ‘til a man hears what he wants to hear and disregards the rest.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies ]


To: Alberta's Child

Over the last several years the Jacksonville Port Authority has spent millions dredging the St John’s River to depth capable of handling the largest of container ships, the idea is to also allow a nuclear powered aircraft carrier, the John F Kennedy was based here at one time


88 posted on 10/21/2021 10:54:49 PM PDT by srmanuel (`)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson