Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: lepton

“They were evaluating the ballot envelopes and found duplicate submissions. The County declared both sets of the envelope signatures valid (usually received a week apart), took the ballots out and mixed them with all the other ballots before counting them.”

I’m not sure if that’s true. Not saying it isn’t, but the presentation didn’t make that clear. Obviously, if the county counted all the duplicate ballots that were sent, then it’s a slam dunk, since the 17,000 figure is almost twice the margin of victory. The reason I’m not sure if this is the case though, is because later in Dr. Shiva’s presentation, he displayed duplicate envelopes where one copy was stamped ‘approved” and the other one wasn’t. The key number would seem to me to be the number of duplicate envelopes that have “approved” stamped on them rather than the total of duplicates mailed in.


474 posted on 09/24/2021 9:05:28 PM PDT by mbrfl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 464 | View Replies ]


To: mbrfl

I do see the same general pattern, however Figure 67 shows 3 envelope images, with two stamped (the approval stamps, and some sort of timestamp on the envelope, look identical), with slightly different handwriting on the dates (but very likely the same person).

You’d think that the County would put duplicates detected in a different folder. That said, the numbers don’t appear to correlate.

Good observation though.

Still rather wild that the verification stamps seem to skip that triangle.


484 posted on 09/24/2021 9:45:16 PM PDT by lepton ("It is useless to attempt to reason a man out of a thing he was never reasoned into"--Jonathan Swift)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 474 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson