I do see the same general pattern, however Figure 67 shows 3 envelope images, with two stamped (the approval stamps, and some sort of timestamp on the envelope, look identical), with slightly different handwriting on the dates (but very likely the same person).
You’d think that the County would put duplicates detected in a different folder. That said, the numbers don’t appear to correlate.
Good observation though.
Still rather wild that the verification stamps seem to skip that triangle.
Just to follow up on our discussion about duplicate mail-in ballots. To add to the complication, Dr. Shiva mentioned near the end of his presentation that very few envelopes were stamped “approved”, including even envelopes that had valid signatures. I think the figure he gave was some ridiculous amount like 500 envelopes that had the “approved” stamp on them, though I’ll have to double check. So it seems like the ‘approve” stamp was used in a happenstance manner, mostly not being used at all, and that the existence of the “approved” stamp had little effect on whether the ballot contained therein, was added to the mix. But the I think the auditors and Senate need to do more work to try and quantify the number of duplicate ballots that were actually added to the “valid ballots’ stack.