Ok, fair enough. I’ll give you credit for being bluntly honest.
To me, it’s not “there” yet, nor if it ever is, “we” will never win that battle.
Why? Because there aren’t enough home owned “AK-47s” (or whatever else the media incorrectly claims conservatives own as weapons) to win such a conflict.
The Fed has tanks and planes. YOU have the equivalent of muskets.
So “game over”. Really. The choice is simple: either accept the results, or form some militia that will fail because of lack of armaments.
Point BLANK. That’s reality. Accept it. Either way, all of this is balderdash.
“May your chains lay lightly upon you.”
That's why the Taliban won in Afghanistan. You know, they had stealth jets, cruise missiles, and some kind of laser weapons from space, right?
Time out!
I am not advocating anything, but your thinking is flawed and a typical example of American arrogance.
A battlle against countless insurgents is not one the federal government would win, especially on today’s purple American soil. No one would, really. The country would crumble in the event of a civil war in today’s environment. And something (really, some thingS), good or bad, would rise from the ashes. And other nations would take advantage of the new landscape. But all those planes and tanks wouldn’t save the union.
Sweet dreams.
Think clandestine. Ever hear of the guerilla Swamp Rats in the Revolutionary War? They did huge damage to the Brits through specific targeting, without artillery, cavalry, or large infantry. Like a poster mentioned above, what did the Taliban have to blitzkrieg across Afghaniscrap before Biteme left behind all the modern weapons? I'm just repeating what a friend told me. I don't support any such action by Americans.
I will do my civic duty and vote in 2022. 2024 remains to be seen, providing I'm still on this rock.