15,386 deaths = 99.99% safe vaccines.
My plastic surgeon nephew in Florida would kill to achieve 99.99 safety number.
Note 212,000,000 Americans jabbed is the denominator.
I realize statistics is a beyotch. Ignore proportions and sizes at your own peril.
trust our government to protect you and its statistics at your own peril...
Those are only the reported VAERS deaths, which even the government says are generally vastly under-reported. The VAERS HHS site says "VAERS receives reports for only a small fraction of actual adverse events". Estimates vary from 1-10 percent reported, meaning at least 90 percent unreported. The fact that none of the assisted-living patients in my post #52 were beyond 2 weeks from their second jab means they likely weren't reported as "vaccine" deaths. They were probably reported as unvaccinated COVID deaths, if they were even reported at all. And OH BY THE WAY, the COVID jab adverse events have long ago exceeded ALL of the previous vaccine events for the last 30 years, combined. Yet we still have legions of Democrats and other sychophants supporting mandatory jabs for COVID.
These are only the short-term effects. The autoimmune effects are years away, but of course we don't know since these "vaccines" were experimental, and even the "approved" Comernaty jab has obviously unproven long-term safety.
Don't ignore the 760,000 adverse events -- you left that out of your numerator. And if those are unreported at 10 percent then that means there are actually 7,600,000 adverse events, but it's probably higher if past VAERS statistical accuracy is any guide -- I know several people that complained of symptoms after the jab, especially their second one, that never reported. And these are only the short-term events, that can't include long-term autoimmune-related illnesses.
The government argument to take the jab totally discounts the effectiveness of alternative treatments. They withold information on, and access to, alternative treatments. This is a dishonest approach, and invalidates the human right to informed consent, a bedrock principle of medicine.
I'm not sure what you mean by "big nothing burger" (your previous posts on this thread) meaning what, exactly? That the complaints are superficial and therefore they should go along with the 'program', or that the jab doesn't hurt many, so go along with the program, or that the jab is ineffective ("probably doesn't even create antibodies"), but 212m have taken it, so just go along with the program? Or what? You say you took it to offer moral support to your wife but you didn't need it, which sounds like you're a fence-sitter on some level, but most of your arguments seem pro-jab.
As you probably know the Swine Flu vaccine was suspended after millions took it and there were "only" 53 (reports vary by a few) deaths, and that was not considered to be an experimental vaccine. What has happened to the public's attitude since then, that we would go from suspending an approved vaccine after 53 deaths to allowing government-mandated jabs with a rubber-stamp "approved" drug that is the exact same formulation as the experimental version? Have our attitudes about human rights changed?
Anyone who is saying millions must have their choice taken away and gamble on death for the "good of the many", while simultaneously restricting and discrediting monoclonal antibodies, HCQ, Ivermectin, etc. in favor of the "vax only" approach, is a Communist.