Skip to comments.
Chinese paper tags Australia as ‘target for a nuclear strike’
The New York Posp ^
| September 17, 2021
| Steven Nelson
Posted on 09/17/2021 5:16:43 PM PDT by American Number 181269513
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40 next last
To: American Number 181269513
Why would China target Australia? Australia is pretty much as communist as China is now.
To: American Number 181269513
Let me guess? Joe and Hunter agreed?
3
posted on
09/17/2021 5:19:20 PM PDT
by
Kudsman
(Baby Lives Matter)
To: American Number 181269513
We may be soon finding out why they want gays, women, and transvestites as part of the draft.
4
posted on
09/17/2021 5:19:21 PM PDT
by
Jonty30
(My superpower is setting people up for failure, without meaning to. )
To: American Number 181269513
Isn’t China putting warships near Hawaii too...
5
posted on
09/17/2021 5:22:01 PM PDT
by
EBH
(Never trust the government or a politician . 1776-2021 May God Save Us.)
To: Extremely Extreme Extremist
I think the Chinese are planning to colonize Australia, and it doesn’t matter to them how “Communist” the Australians are among themselves.
6
posted on
09/17/2021 5:24:46 PM PDT
by
Salman
(It's not a "slippery slope" if it was part of the program all along. )
To: EBH
A nuclear strike on Australia would surely cause a full blown nuclear retaliatory attack on China. Wouldn’t it?
Chinasure knows how to make friends and engender good feelings.
7
posted on
09/17/2021 5:25:53 PM PDT
by
TheConservator
(Beware the tyranny of the woke mob. There has never been a greater threat to liberty.)
To: American Number 181269513
Russia leveling China with 200 nukes will shut up the weenie ChiComms for 500 years. Or sending a platoon of Indian Gurkhas against the weenie Chicomm paper tiger military will accomplish about the same thing.
8
posted on
09/17/2021 5:26:20 PM PDT
by
sergeantdave
(Federal courts no longer have any standing in America. )
To: American Number 181269513
If the next war goes nuclear some of us won’t live 90 minutes.
9
posted on
09/17/2021 5:27:07 PM PDT
by
BenLurkin
(The above is not a statement of fact. It is either opinion, or satire. Or both.)
To: American Number 181269513
They’ve simply switched to nuclear power to propel themselves through the water. The only enhanced capability would be time on station and perhaps an increase in payload.
10
posted on
09/17/2021 5:29:01 PM PDT
by
Rowdyone
To: American Number 181269513
On a side note, Gen. Milley assured China that their first strike secret is safe with him.
11
posted on
09/17/2021 5:30:54 PM PDT
by
LittleBillyInfidel
(This tagline has been formatted to fit the screen. Some content has been edited.)
To: BenLurkin
Dont look at the bright light, if you hear a loud BOOM
12
posted on
09/17/2021 5:31:25 PM PDT
by
BarbM
(FU Pence. You refuse to be alone with a woman, but have no compunction in screwing the USA))
To: BarbM
Where I’m at the light will get here first.
13
posted on
09/17/2021 5:33:57 PM PDT
by
BenLurkin
(The above is not a statement of fact. It is either opinion, or satire. Or both.)
To: American Number 181269513
Imagine if President Trump had said this about China.
14
posted on
09/17/2021 5:35:11 PM PDT
by
Steely Tom
([Voter Fraud] == [Civil War])
To: Steely Tom
The USA need not worry. Biden would never nuke his cash-cow.
We are the France now. Surrender monkeys.
15
posted on
09/17/2021 5:41:08 PM PDT
by
BarbM
(FU Pence. You refuse to be alone with a woman, but have no compunction in screwing the USA))
To: Extremely Extreme Extremist
More land to settle, colonize and conquer.
They’ll use another form of flu to kill off the vast majority of roos who took the jabs before they nuke them however.
It’d be such a waste to do it that way.
16
posted on
09/17/2021 5:43:25 PM PDT
by
Roman_War_Criminal
(Jesus + Something = Nothing ; Jesus + Nothing = Everything )
To: TheConservator
“A nuclear strike on Australia would surely cause a full blown nuclear retaliatory attack on China. Wouldn’t it?”
Not a chance
17
posted on
09/17/2021 5:52:23 PM PDT
by
KingLudd
To: Roman_War_Criminal
Actually, less than one-fourth of Australia is inhabitable. Most of the interior is a dry desert and Australia has no known natural resources.
So either the Chicoms will control densely-populated areas or a huge desert interior full of wild, poisonous animals.
To: Extremely Extreme Extremist
You’d be surprised what a resourceful group of people could do with “uninhabitable land”.
Eskimos live on ice sheets and many millions live in desert areas.
Even early American explorers called the Great Plans a “wasteland”.
19
posted on
09/17/2021 6:00:24 PM PDT
by
Roman_War_Criminal
(Jesus + Something = Nothing ; Jesus + Nothing = Everything )
To: Roman_War_Criminal
There’s just no comparison. Number #1, Australians never had the frontiersman drive like we had, they were founded as a penal colony. Number #2, the interior is pure desert. It is the equivalent of trying to farm in Death Valley. And #3, they’re pretty much screwed because they surrendered their guns and are now under COVID lockdowns.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson