Buck and Clay and Alex Berenson draw erroneous conclusions that I spot simply from having read a whole lot of PubMed papers over the last year and a half. One simple rule for the journalist and the amateur alike ought to be to read more when your personal conclusions are entirely different from what the professionals in the field are saying. And by professionals I don’t mean politicized hacks like Fauci. It almost always means that you are overlooking some factor that you aren’t even aware of. Those three could probably find someone in the virology field to bounce their ideas off of, but instead what I see them doing is parroting the dubious claims of outliers.
What do you make of the sit rep in Israel and UK
The one who i paid most attention to was the Trinidadian epidemiology guy
Don’t recall name
Talked quasi Rasta
The vax complex seems to move the goal posts
92%
70%
50%
Makes it better if you get it anyhow
And so on
It’s a mess is putting it charitably
The Trini phd was talking in depth about viral load in the vaxxed