Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: mewzilla
I think they counted on ginning up hundreds of thousands of fake ballots so they could toss the yes votes, literally in the trash and/or using software, and have plenty of spare fake no votes to make up the numbers.

Newsom is up by about 2.6 million votes currently. If the fraud is that widespread then it shouldn't be hard to prove.

133 posted on 09/15/2021 4:16:26 AM PDT by DoodleDawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 132 | View Replies ]


To: DoodleDawg
https://twitter.com/bgmasters/status/1437914048239071236?s=19

Via Blake Masters COO Thiel Capital running for U.S. Senate in AZ.

All it takes to see how a mail-in voter voted in the CA recall is to shine a weak cellphone flashlight through the back of the envelope.
Suppose you wanted to use this tiny flaw to throw out the ballots of people who voted the wrong way. What would you do?
You would push hard to encourage voting by mail and extend the voting period. And you’d push to allow ballots to come in for days afterwards (7 days in CA!)
If one corrupt person can check one ballot manually every 10 seconds, that’s 360 per hour or 2,880 per day. If the election voting period lasts *4 weeks*, then one bad apple can process 57,600 ballots.
What if four people worked just *one* diligent 8-hour shift, flashlight-sorting a pile of 50-50 votes?
Exploits like this exist. Anyone who says otherwise is lying to you.
Mass mail-in voting for mere convenience is insane and we should not tolerate it.

I would point out that pretty much every mail carrier has a cell phone nowdays.

141 posted on 09/15/2021 7:49:18 AM PDT by Pete from Shawnee Mission ( )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 133 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson