Posted on 09/10/2021 7:09:39 PM PDT by E. Pluribus Unum
Prove this. You really need to have solid proof before making such an accusation.
EVERYONE is exempt from the ILLEGAL mandate.
>> executive orders
It was brought to my attention earlier that we’re talking about EOs.
How can an EO affect the private sector in this regard?
One law for us; another law for them. We the People are truly getting fed up with this double standard.
If true, this is because of separation of powers in the Constitution although this whole mandate is unconstitutional.
they will keep their civil rights.
the rest will be TRANS-humans, void of rights
owned by pFizer, according to SCOTUS (Malta to decide).
TRANS-humans have two purposes.
Organs and Adrenochrome must flow.
Separation of Powers.
Laughable given it was a power grab by Biden to begin with, I know, but Congress and the judiciary would have to mandate this on themselves.
You must be kidding.
Right, yes.
Of course they are.
No, you don't.
RUSSIA! RUSSIA! RUSSIA! RUSSIA! RUSSIA! RUSSIA! RUSSIA! RUSSIA! RUSSIA! RUSSIA! RUSSIA! RUSSIA! RUSSIA! RUSSIA! RUSSIA! RUSSIA! RUSSIA! RUSSIA! RUSSIA! RUSSIA! RUSSIA! RUSSIA! RUSSIA! RUSSIA! RUSSIA! RUSSIA! RUSSIA! RUSSIA! RUSSIA! RUSSIA! RUSSIA! RUSSIA! RUSSIA! RUSSIA! RUSSIA! RUSSIA! RUSSIA! RUSSIA! RUSSIA! RUSSIA! RUSSIA! RUSSIA! RUSSIA! RUSSIA! RUSSIA! RUSSIA! RUSSIA! RUSSIA! RUSSIA! RUSSIA! RUSSIA! RUSSIA! RUSSIA! RUSSIA! RUSSIA! RUSSIA! RUSSIA! RUSSIA! RUSSIA! RUSSIA! RUSSIA! RUSSIA! RUSSIA! RUSSIA! RUSSIA! RUSSIA! RUSSIA! RUSSIA! RUSSIA! RUSSIA! RUSSIA! RUSSIA! RUSSIA! RUSSIA! RUSSIA! RUSSIA! RUSSIA! RUSSIA! RUSSIA! RUSSIA! RUSSIA! RUSSIA! RUSSIA! RUSSIA! RUSSIA! RUSSIA! RUSSIA! RUSSIA! RUSSIA! RUSSIA! RUSSIA! RUSSIA! RUSSIA! RUSSIA! RUSSIA! RUSSIA! RUSSIA! RUSSIA! RUSSIA! RUSSIA! RUSSIA! RUSSIA! RUSSIA! RUSSIA! RUSSIA! RUSSIA! RUSSIA! RUSSIA! RUSSIA! RUSSIA! RUSSIA! RUSSIA! RUSSIA! RUSSIA! RUSSIA! RUSSIA! RUSSIA! RUSSIA! RUSSIA! RUSSIA! RUSSIA! RUSSIA! RUSSIA! RUSSIA! RUSSIA! RUSSIA! RUSSIA! RUSSIA! RUSSIA! RUSSIA! RUSSIA! RUSSIA! RUSSIA! RUSSIA! RUSSIA! RUSSIA! RUSSIA! RUSSIA! RUSSIA! RUSSIA! RUSSIA! RUSSIA! RUSSIA! RUSSIA! RUSSIA! RUSSIA! RUSSIA! RUSSIA! RUSSIA! RUSSIA! RUSSIA! RUSSIA! RUSSIA! RUSSIA! RUSSIA! RUSSIA! RUSSIA! RUSSIA! RUSSIA! RUSSIA! RUSSIA! RUSSIA! RUSSIA! RUSSIA! RUSSIA! RUSSIA! RUSSIA! RUSSIA! RUSSIA! RUSSIA! RUSSIA! RUSSIA! RUSSIA! RUSSIA! RUSSIA! RUSSIA! RUSSIA! RUSSIA! RUSSIA! RUSSIA! RUSSIA! RUSSIA! RUSSIA! RUSSIA! RUSSIA! RUSSIA! RUSSIA! RUSSIA! RUSSIA! RUSSIA! RUSSIA! RUSSIA! RUSSIA! RUSSIA! RUSSIA! RUSSIA! RUSSIA! RUSSIA! RUSSIA! RUSSIA! RUSSIA! RUSSIA! RUSSIA! RUSSIA! RUSSIA! RUSSIA! RUSSIA! RUSSIA! RUSSIA! RUSSIA! RUSSIA! RUSSIA! RUSSIA! RUSSIA! RUSSIA! RUSSIA! RUSSIA! RUSSIA! RUSSIA! RUSSIA! RUSSIA! RUSSIA! RUSSIA! RUSSIA! RUSSIA! RUSSIA! RUSSIA! RUSSIA! RUSSIA! RUSSIA! RUSSIA! RUSSIA! RUSSIA! RUSSIA! RUSSIA! RUSSIA! RUSSIA! RUSSIA! RUSSIA! RUSSIA! RUSSIA! RUSSIA! RUSSIA! RUSSIA! RUSSIA! RUSSIA! RUSSIA! RUSSIA! RUSSIA! RUSSIA! RUSSIA! RUSSIA! RUSSIA! RUSSIA! RUSSIA! RUSSIA! RUSSIA! RUSSIA! RUSSIA! RUSSIA! RUSSIA! RUSSIA! RUSSIA! RUSSIA! RUSSIA! RUSSIA! RUSSIA! RUSSIA! RUSSIA! RUSSIA! RUSSIA! RUSSIA! RUSSIA!
I vote for Members of Congress, which makes me a ‘member’, too.
I’m not sure what your point if. Of course the point of the article is true. Executive orders can only bind the executive branch. The President has no jurisdiction to tell the legislative and judicial branches what to do with their employees. This is imposed on the public by having an executive agency, OSHA, impose a mandate in private businesses it regulates. I do t think this successfully survivors challenge, but that’s the logic of it
As the SNL Church Lady would say:
“Well, isn’t that just special?”
“Rules for thee, but not for me.”
Because, marxism.
Really seems like anything goes. An executive order (I believe) controls actions within the Executive Branch. If he wants to control the military, or federal contractors, that may be one thing. But the Labor Department should not control companies of >100 employees just based on a EO.
And they don’t seem concerned that mandating an experimental jab for soldiers may negatively impact our national defense. But, of course, you wouldn’t want to mandate it for judges or government staff — I mean, hey, what if there were side effects?? How would we survive if those people were impacted??
This whole thing is a mess, not based on real legislation, or a real crisis, not based on due process, or equal protection under the law. It’s a naked power grab by people who stole an election.
Because the Great and Mighty Joe, leader of the prog has proclaimed it to be so.
The United Scribe Guild CNNNBCABCCBSMSNBC has transcribed the words of the Great and Mighty Joe into Law.
Obey or be cast out.
.
OK - who is in charge of the judicial branch? Can the Supreme Court issue an order that would apply to all federal judges?
Weaponizing OSHA as a “workaround” to statutory limitations has Rachel Levine’s manlike fingerprints all over it.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.